Search for: "U.S. v. Mark" Results 4341 - 4360 of 11,358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
In Vox, Ian Millhiser analyzes FDA v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 3:03 am by Edith Roberts
” Joel Ebert reports at the Nashville Tennessean (via How Appealing) that “[a]ttorneys representing Tennessee are asking the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:45 am by gavin.n.johnson
Nor can a mark owner simply use or display a mark in the sale or advertising of services to U.S. consumers. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 8:08 am by Victoria Gallegos
  Jordan Schneider shared an episode of ChinaTalk, titled “Bo Xilai and How Xi Learned from the Chongqing Model”: Abby Lemert and Eleanor Runde assessed the latest U.S. [read post]
5 May 2017, 6:00 am by Karl Bayer
by Mark Kantor and Karl Bayer In National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 11:35 am by Andrew Keane Woods
The U.S. said that the bill had not been marked up and that it was the court’s job to interpret the law as it is, not as it will be. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:38 am by Saraphin Dhanani
Since then, the U.S. has regarded the Donbas as a “Russian-controlled” Ukrainian territory, the separatists in the region as “Russian-backed” forces, and when referring to the so-called DPR and LPR territory in official government documents, has put their names in quotation marks to reinforce the U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:05 am by Guest Blogger
It remains to be seen whether Kaplan's ruling marks only a temporary setback for the government's prosecution of Ghailani, on trial for his role in the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in East Africa. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 12:03 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Overhauser Law Offices the publisher of this site, assists with U.S. and Foreign Trademark searches, Trademark Applications and assists with enforcing Trademarks via Infringement Litigation and Licensing. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 6:14 am by James Romoser
(Ian Millhiser, Vox) Five Thoughts on the Timing of U.S. v. [read post]