Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK" Results 4341 - 4360 of 7,218
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2012, 7:00 am
", Dennis Crouch says that this view has been advanced by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in its recent proposed guidelines. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:59 pm
United States, 168 U.S. 1, 49 (1897). [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:50 pm by Christine Anne George
Earlier this week, the United States Patent and Trademark Office refused to grant Jay-Z and Beyonce a trademark for “Blue Ivy. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 12:04 pm by paperstreet
  The non-Catholic Russian Grand Priory became known as The Ecumenical Order, and it had its first meeting in the United States on January 10, 1908. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:52 pm by Florian Mueller
Three weeks ago I reported on Oracle's notice of appeal of the final ruling of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in the Java-Android intellectual property dispute. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 11:21 pm by Evan Anderson
  Those with even a basic understanding of U.S. trademark law should immediately be wary of these reports, as they plainly overshadow the purpose of trademark law and the limitations on what protection is offered to the owners of United States trademark rights.First, after a cursory review of the seven TEBOWING trademark applications on the USPTO, it is apparent that Tim Tebow is the owner of the TEBOWING wording as used in connection with… [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 5:41 pm by Radiance W. Harris
 On October 16, 2012, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) granted a federal registration to Veronica Morales, a Boston-based wedding planner, for the trademark BLUE IVY (U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:42 pm by tom
Like trademarks, the issuance of certification marks in the U.S. is controlled by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 1:54 am by Florian Mueller
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has good news for Samsung, and Samsung has already shared it with Judge Koh in a late-night filing. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 11:23 am by Gene Quinn
The United States Patent and Trademark Office is proposing new rules that would align the USPTO's professional responsibility rules with those of most other U.S. jurisdictions. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 11:23 am by Gene Quinn
The United States Patent and Trademark Office is proposing new rules that would align the USPTO's professional responsibility rules with those of most other U.S. jurisdictions. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Walker, Text-Book of the Patent Laws of the United States of America (1883) (full text also available for 1885, 1889, 1895, 1904) (Walker on Patents has gone through many editions and is now Moy's Walker (MOY-PAT) on Westlaw). [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 8:16 am by Michael C. Smith
  Over a year later, Samsung petitioned the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) for inter partes reexamination for all the claims Fractus asserted in the litigation. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 10:09 am by Chris Castle
For purposes of facilitating compensation to artists of musical works and combating copyright infringement, not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Librarian of Congress, in consultation with the Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinate and the United States Patent and Trademark Office, shall submit to Congress a report that provides a set of recommendations about how the Federal Government can facilitate, and possibly establish, a… [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 7:46 am by John J. Cahill
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the European Patent Office (EPO) jointly launched the Cooperative Patent Classification System (CPC) and released a finalized set of CPC definitions. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 11:49 am by Christopher F. Lonegro
Perhaps anticipating the private sector’s broad interest in the issues to be considered, the court waived the usual requirement for third parties to obtain leave of the court before filing an amicus brief and specifically invited the United States Patent and Trademark Office to state its views. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 7:32 am by Charles Chevalier
Cir. 2011), the CAFC reiterated that to establish unenforceability based on inequitable conduct before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), a party must prove by clear and convincing evidence that (1) information material to patentability was withheld from the PTO, or material misinformation was provided to the PTO, and that such act was done (2) with the intent to deceive or mislead. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 2:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
FOOTNOTES 8 The plausibility of this argument is bolstered by Gurvey's allegation that Cowan withdrew from representing Gurvey before the United States Patent and Trademark Office due to what Cowan allegedly termed a "conflict of interest. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 11:33 am by Jake Ward
  Hat tip to the United States Patent and Trademark Office Facebook page for bringing this one to our attention. [read post]