Search for: "United States v. Alter" Results 4341 - 4360 of 4,640
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2017, 6:59 am by Brian Cordery
She addressed the state of implementation of the Agreement. 12 have ratified so far but not Germany and the UK. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 4:46 am by SHG
The privilege predated this nation, and was explained 180 years ago by the United States Supreme Court in Stein v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 12:02 pm by Gabe Acevedo
The case sent shock waves through Biglaw, and technology vendors and consultants scrambled to find methods that would withstand judicial scrutiny.The second reason defensibility became an issue was the rise of legal outsourcing, both in the United States and abroad. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 12:06 am
Although no one reported seeing sparks fly, the attorneys in Adlerstein v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 10:05 am by Eugene Volokh
That there exist Russian expatriates in the United States who support Putin does not compel a finding that the February 27 Policy facially discriminates against them. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 10:01 am
The Baze DecisionOn April 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued its plurality opinion inBaze v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
The Court, in deciding this case, is not likely to reopen its 1872 precedent in United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 11:46 am by Edward Smith
Carmichael Pedestrian Killed Carmichael Pedestrian Killed I’m Ed Smith, a Sacramento pedestrian accident attorney. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:19 am by Ron Coleman
Applicant maintained that the dominant portion of his design is the map of Africa, while in the cited mark the map of the United States is dominant, that the cited design suggests that Africa dominates the United States, and that the alteration of his design to fit the United States outline within the map of Africa profoundly changes the commercial impression of his mark as compared to the cited mark. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]