Search for: "United States v. David" Results 4341 - 4360 of 6,867
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am by Marty Lederman
  To be sure, all United States persons, including citizens and taxpayers, have an interest in ensuring that the Executive complies with the law, and acts only when authorized to do so. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 10:29 pm
Gregory The Significance of Sprint/United Management Company v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:33 am by Mary L. Dudziak
"The 18th Amendment had been ratified a year earlier, banning 'the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors' within the United States and its territories. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am by Conor McEvily
”  The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 5:53 pm by John Culhane
See Arizonans For Official English v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:49 pm by Kalvis Golde
David Holbrook is a resident of Bristol, Virginia, whose home is powered by TVA. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
I find the start of each academic year invariably invigorating. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 8:03 pm by Public Protection Lawyer
The United States District Court for Eastern California threw Alexis out of Court and she appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:01 am
In each case the Secretary of State has issued a certificate under section 33 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Immigration Act 2001 that the aliens' removal from the United Kingdom would be conducive to the public good. [read post]
11 May 2018, 3:01 am by NCC Staff
“In the exercise of those powers, the United States may remove everything put upon highways, natural or artificial, to obstruct the passage of interstate commerce, or the carrying of the mails,” said Justice David Brewer. [read post]