Search for: "United States v. Grant"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 26,187
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2022, 6:57 am
Respondent argued that under Ozaltin, which she stated is “the leading case” on this issue, an award of fees is clearly inappropriate because she acted in good faith when she and the children remained in the United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 9:14 am
Colvin, July 26, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit More Blog Entries: Who is Getting the Most from Social Security Disability? [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 6:35 am
United States (2014), Katz v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 7:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 1:51 pm
The Court of Justice held in Case C-484/04 Commission v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 3:26 pm
A pretty good panel gives us a pretty disappointing decision, in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:48 pm
County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:29 am
Since the Court’s 1984 ruling in Strickland v Washington, the United States Supreme Court has applied a two part test for determining whether counsel was ineffective: (a) whether there was a breach of counsel’s duty to the defendant; and, (b) “but for” that error, the defendant stood a reasonable chance for acquittal. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:04 am
Three cases granted for a future argument date Basith Ghazali, M.D. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 10:43 am
On Oct. 6, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the first one, United States v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 1:54 pm
Policy considerations and implications in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:18 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 3:52 pm
" United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 4:06 pm
The United States Supreme Court issued a 7-2 decision today, in Snyder v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 11:26 am
CAAF issued an interesting order in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:31 am
” (slip op. at 23-24) (citing Strickland and United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 3:05 am
The Supreme Court of the United States recently granted certiorari in Stanley v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:58 am
It reasoned that although she was in a dire financial position, she likely had some income to sustain her living in the United States, and she presented no evidence that she could not work in the United States to earn income and pay an award. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:41 am
Reil v. [read post]
