Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend" Results 4341 - 4360 of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2018, 9:13 am by Elizabeth Kruska
”Since trial judges dont moonlight as law tutors for pro se corporate litigants, the court instructed Extreme’s principal to hire counsel by March 6, 2015, which was extended to April 13 (here’s a good case on the corporate representation rule for anyone who wants to put their law nerd cap on). [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 9:05 am by Gritsforbreakfast
 Note, the ads don't say, "You drink, you drive, you go to prison," so from the get-go it's clear that whoever wrote the lede was stretching to find (or generate) controversy. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:01 pm by Zoe Tillman
The former U.S. attorney for Delaware, Colm Connolly, now a partner at Morgan Lewis & Bockius, said in an e-mail that Contreras “has all of the attributes you'd look for in a judge. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 8:48 am by Jeff Gamso
But oral argument isn't, or at least shouldn't be, the lawyer standing up and blathering (however brilliantly or movingly or wateverly) to the judges or justices. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 1:52 pm
Here, Judge Fisher analogizes the capture of e-mail addresses, IP addresses of websites visited, and the volume of information transmitted, to old pen register searches (which do not implicate the Fourth because pen registers don't reveal content). [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
This is not to say that an attorney shouldn't be passionate or should refrain from forcefully presenting her position on the case at hand. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:29 am by SHG
  Validation of our efforts isn't always easy to come by, as outcomes don't necessarily correlate with our efforts or skills. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The clock started running the moment of injury, amendments to name new defendants don't relate back to the original filing date, and we can't review the district court's decision not to toll the SOL cuz it wasn't raised on appeal. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:03 am by Dane Johnson
  Gershowitz - why don't you walk down the hall and ask your fellow law professor that had his case dismissed if he agrees with you. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 10:01 pm by Robichaud
 This article intends to focus on the latter since you dont need a lawyer to explain to you why admitting impairment by drug while operating a motor vehicle would result in a conviction (that’s why we always advise people to not make a statement to police!) [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 7:43 am
  And I can't help but wonder whether Judge Trager granted the 2255 motion just to watch the Circuit squirm its way out of this one. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 3:00 am by Eric Turkewitz
John Hochfelder has written quite a bit on that recurring issue, including this:So I don't at all question the integrity, acumen, or commitment of our appellate court judges. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 5:32 pm by Susan I. Nelson
"His position was we have to react because we don't get any choice in what prosecutors file in the court, but let's organize it in a way that is effective," said Heather Williams, Arizona's first assistant federal public defender. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:42 am by Howard Knopf
The Judge ruled that the Berne Convention didn't help here because it is not self executing.None of this is surprising or even new. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 8:25 am
Had it been PP&CIGA, I wouldn't have been surprised if they just dared the judge to send the Marshals out. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:44 pm by Mike Scarcella
“I’ll deal with the sanctions associated with the [contempt] at a later date, but that’s outrageous for the Department of Justice, the largest law firm on the planet, to come before a federal judge and say, 'yeah, Judge, you know, we recognized your order, we realized it and we just haven’t gotten around to complying with it, and we really dont have a good faith reason or any… [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 11:34 pm
"We're having this pitched battle in court... when it doesn't matter," Freed says. [read post]