Search for: "AT&T"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 881,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2007, 4:45 pm
Tomorrow will be my third time teaching the new FIS course Social Networking Tools: Hands on Learning. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 3:04 pm
This decision is another illustration of the more and more severe handling of late amendments of requests by the Boards. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 11:19 am
Judge Jed S. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm
Claim 1 of the main request read:1. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 11:45 am
Another way people who talk directly to an insurance adjuster lose compensation is through a verbal settlement agreement recorded in a telephone statement. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
What happens when a Board finds, during oral proceedings (OPs) in the absence of the applicant, that the main claim on file overcomes the objections that led to the refusal by the Examining Division (ED) but that the amendment has caused clarity and A 123(2) problems in the dependent claims? [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 5:39 pm
The proprietor of the patent considered the appeal of Schott AG inadmissible because the opposition filed at that time by Schott Glas was inadmissible. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 4:30 pm
27 Feb 2010, 11:00 am
[...] [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 10:37 am
At Tracey Cline’s demand—and despite a caution from N&O reporter Andrew Curliss that she might want to reconsider, given their content—the N&O released its reporters’ and editors’ e-mail exchanges with the Durham County “minister of justice. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 7:11 am
What Congress intended with Section 230 has nothing to do with what the First Amendment protects, and courts should stop implying otherwise. [read post]
25 May 2010, 3:01 pm
[7.4.1] Dependent claim 5 refers to the presence of a lotion further comprising an antiviral composition whereby the antiviral composition comprises from about 0.05% to 80% by weight of said lotion and wherein the antiviral composition is a water soluble metal ion. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 3:02 pm
The present decision is a useful reminder that Board of appeal decisions can be very quick, in particular in ex parte proceedings where no oral proceedings (OPs) have been requested.[1.1] The examining division (ED) in its decision explained why in its opinion the subject-matter of claim 1 lacks an inventive step. [1.2] In its grounds of appeal the appellant explained why it disagreed with that decision. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
This decision deals with an appeal against the refusal of an application by the Examining Division. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 12:00 am
Florida is a no-fault auto insurance state. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 6:15 pm
3 Aug 2007, 12:07 pm
Republican Presidential candidate and anti-immigrant zealot Tom Tancredo never ceases to amaze. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:12 pm
The Opposition Division (OD) came to the conclusion that Claim 1 of the auxiliary request was novel over the A 54(3) document D8 because the skilled person had to make several selections in order to arrive at the claimed subject-matter. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:12 pm
The Opposition Division (OD) came to the conclusion that Claim 1 of the auxiliary request was novel over the A 54(3) document D8 because the skilled person had to make several selections in order to arrive at the claimed subject-matter. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 11:01 am
The present decision deals with an appeal against the revocation of a patent by the Opposition Division (OD). [read post]
