Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C" Results 4361 - 4380 of 4,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2019, 11:18 am by Michael Lowe
Sometimes, just possessing a piece of property can get you arrested in Texas if it is an “illegal weapon” under the law. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and David Moosmann
Furthermore, in deciding the question of whether a bona fide emergency declaration has been made, the decision last spring in Trump v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:03 pm by David M. McLain
In no way does the Bill require a liability insurer: (a) to pay to remedy defective work that does not cause property damage; (b) to pay for the completion of unfinished or non-conforming work; (c) to pay delay damages or (d) to pay for punchlist or warranty repairs. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:09 am by James Morphy, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP,
Currently, Item 10(c) of Regulation S-K permits, but does not require, registrants to disclose in registration statements and periodic reports the credit ratings assigned to classes of debt securities, convertible debt securities and preferred stock. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 4:30 pm
., the family code statutes and cases interpreting them) only applies to couples once they have entered into a legally recognized relationship; otherwise, contract law governs the rights of unmarried, non-RDP, couples. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 1:12 pm
(Pix (C) Larry Catá Backer 2014)This Blog Essay site devotes every February to a series of integrated but short essays on a single theme. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
These fair access requirements, first appearing in Florida’s House Bill 3 (2023) (“FL HB 3”), generally prohibit financial institutions from denying or canceling services to a person, or otherwise discriminating against a person in making available services, on the basis of enumerated factors, commonly including political opinions, religious beliefs, “social credit scores,” or any factor that is not “quantitative, impartial, and risk-based. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:38 pm
The first, while recognizing that courts have divided on how to treat predominance in single-issue (so-called "(c)(4)") classes, does not go on to label them "confused," as the current draft does. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am by Marty Lederman
In an article here back in July, I explained why Judge Cannon is wrong and why the Supreme Court was correct to hold in United States v. [read post]