Search for: "Doe 35"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 17,233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2010, 1:01 pm
The Board rejected the claims under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 5:16 pm
A "yes" to any of these questions means that permission does not meet the first permitted commercial marketing prong of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 5:15 am
What does all of this have to do with Computer Associates? [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 7:44 am
If, after imposition of the excise tax, Manufacturer A charges [the same] $100 and does not separately state a tax, the price is deemed to be $35, and Manufacturer A owes $65 in tax. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:43 am
Although I, like most law professors, can do a riff on how "35" is indeterminate, that is recognized as "academic" in the most pejorative sense; unless and until some 33-year-old is viewed as the truly indispensable person to inhabit the Oval Office, it will be taken as a given that we "know" what "35" means, which means a the passage of time time measured in solar (and not, for example, lunar) years. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:35 pm
All it does is turn off the reader, and may even turn the reader against the writer. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 5:49 pm
The recognition of this right does not abrogate any private or public property rights, nor does it limit the state’s power to regulate commercial activity. [read post]
10 May 2008, 3:00 am
35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:22 am
See 35 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Research shows that lawyers will advise their clients not to raise family violence as an issue, for fear of retribution and because the justice system does not recognize it properly. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
Promega Corporation, No. 14-1538 (Whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding that supplying a single, commodity component of a multi-component invention from the United States is an infringing act under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 5:33 am
For those that are prosecuted, does the punishment fit the crime? [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 7:37 am
In particular, the court found the claims directed toward an abstract idea and thus invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 12:33 pm
Cir. 2021) [OPINION] Obviousness of a design patent is governed by 35 U.S.C. 103, just like utility patents. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:26 pm
“Motor 8bicycle” does not include an electric bicycle.9Section 7. 340.01 (30) (b) of the statutes is repealed.10Section 8. 340.01 (35) of the statutes is amended to read:11340.01 (35) “Motor vehicle" means a vehicle, including a combination of 2 or 12more vehicles or an articulated vehicle, which is self-propelled, except a vehicle 13operated exclusively on a rail. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 2:48 am
It does demonstrate, however, that race remains a very strong factor in voter preference -- despite all of the hoopla about the demise of race, racism, and social conservatism. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:54 am
The mere fact that such a DNA molecule does not occur in isolated form in nature does not, by itself, answer the question. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:31 am
As a general proposition, the patent statute requires that, in order to obtain patent protection, the claimed invention in the patent application must be novel, 35 U.S.C. sec. 102, and non-obvious, 35 U.S.C. sec. 103. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 9:36 am
Below are some highlights of the PMLA about which employers in Michigan should be aware: Who does the law cover? [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:59 am
So what does this mean for your practice and law firm marketing efforts? [read post]
