Search for: "Does 1 - 47" Results 4361 - 4380 of 4,452
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2007, 10:59 am
" The petition poses two questions: "1. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 3:19 pm
Defendant being a passenger in a vehicle owned and driven by a relative does not grant the defendant standing. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 5:28 pm
If men and women are distributed across occupations in exactly the same way, the index is 0; if there is complete separation, the index is 1. [read post]
31 May 2007, 12:49 pm
Justice Kline writes passionately of the "profound nature of the liberty interest" at stake (dis. opn., post at p. 47) and of "autonomy privacy," (dis. opn., post at pp. 9, 22) but does not cite a single case where the as [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Harper & James, in their tort treatise, said much the same thing: "conformity to the legislative standard. . .may so clearly constitute due care under the circumstances of any given case that the court will decide it does as a matter of law. [read post]
22 May 2007, 6:30 pm
App. 47, 601 S.E.2d 428 (2004).32 However, in 1999, the Georgia legislature added subsection (1)(a)(2), which proscribes the carnal knowledge of a female less than 10 years old as a capital offense. [read post]
16 May 2007, 2:43 pm
Then at 1:02 he speeds up!!! [read post]
16 May 2007, 6:44 am
The problem of "expression of agreement" does not stop on CC alone, but to other non-conventional agreements in the internet and especially, a public license agreement.I shall remind you that even in the US, the "wraps" agreement are subject to legal controversies. [read post]
16 May 2007, 3:24 am
At issue before the Ninth Circuit was whether and to what extent the Communications Decency Act ("CDA"), 47 U.S.C. [read post]
14 May 2007, 9:40 pm
All too often we talk about the Supreme Court as if the words it uses described the things it does. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:12 am
Comm'r, 47 F.3d 342, 347 (9th Cir. 1995) ("As a general rule, an appellate court will not consider arguments which were not first raised before the district court, absent a showing of exceptional circumstances. [read post]
10 May 2007, 2:44 pm
The Court has held previously that accidental spillage of hydrocarbons onto land may be characterized as an action by which the holder of those hydrocarbons ‘discards' them (see, see Case C-1/03 Van de Walle and others, paragraph 47). [read post]