Search for: "Does 1-27"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 12,488
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
" Orascom and Natgasoline filed a response asserting that appellate jurisdiction exists because this case involves (1) an appeal from a final judgment; or (2) a statutorily authorized interlocutory appeal; or (3) a mandamus proceeding. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 12:22 pm
And 72 percent of respondents chose one of the middle three options, not either 1 or 5. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
Texwinca states that it does not have a controlling influence over Megawell, and that it has no responsibility for the working conditions at the factories in Vietnam. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:49 am
§ 5103A(a)(1). [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:49 am
§ 5103A(a)(1). [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 12:30 pm
” SBA rejected that comment in the following response: SBA does not adopt this comment. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Jane Doe 2, 18-677, and Trump v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
City of San Diego (2018) 27 Cal.App.5th 281. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
That’s Thursday at 1:00 PM. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:45 pm
§2252A(b)(1) Possession of visual representations of sexual abuse of children (first offense) No minimum 10 years 18 (27-33 months) 18 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
Ct. 2448 (2018) – Decided on June 27, 2018, in this employment case the Supreme Court considered whether Abood v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm
A. et al., "New Approaches to Information Management: Attribute-Centric Data Systems", Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval (SPIRE 2000), 27-29 September 2000, IEEE, pp. 17-27;D2: Furnas, G. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm
What does Brexit mean for data protection: part 2 The Panopticon Blog has a post about the case of Campbell v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland [2018] UKUT 372 (AAC) – Death and the DPA. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 12:47 pm
The counties of conviction were quite diverse, with the 39 cases coming from 27 different counties. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
Section 32 should be amended to clarify that section 32(2) does not relieve an employer of the obligation to ensure meal breaks are provided as required by section 32(1), and applies when it is necessary to interrupt a meal break because of an emergency or other exceptional circumstance. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
Section 32 should be amended to clarify that section 32(2) does not relieve an employer of the obligation to ensure meal breaks are provided as required by section 32(1), and applies when it is necessary to interrupt a meal break because of an emergency or other exceptional circumstance. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
Gaos with 27 amicus briefs filed. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
On Dec. 27, 2017, the NPCSC declared that the cooperation agreement was consistent with the Basic Law. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
Oregon, the Supreme Court concluded that the Sixth Amendment required that juries convict by a unanimous vote, but concluded that this requirement does not apply to the states; accordingly, a state criminal defendant may lawfully be convicted based on (for example) a 9-3 vote. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:49 pm
However, based on a docket entry indicating that a standing order was entered on December 27 requiring the U.S. [read post]
