Search for: "Does v. United States of America" Results 4361 - 4380 of 4,698
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
  Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am by Charley
Schwarzenegger in the federal United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am by Kevin Kaufman
Nor does the state lack for resources, at least by conventional measures: Connecticut has the third-highest state and local tax collections per capita, at $7,410 per person. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 1:03 am by Bill Marler
Surveillance for Acute Viral Hepatitis—- United States, 2007. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 4:00 pm by Ryan Radia
The part about websites “subject to seizure in the United States” refers to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:30 am by Walter Haydock
This sizeable number does not even include more intensive—although less numerous—preliminary and full investigations. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
"[The following article includes a table which lists out the statutorily permissible uses of polygraph examination in the different state jurisdictions of the United States of America: Henry T. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
("ACI") appeals from the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
While current laws do provide some protection against imitation goods, such protection is only for trademarked goods and does not provide any protection when the good  is copied under a slightly different logo or label. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
See, e.g., Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]