Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 4361 - 4380 of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2018, 10:35 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Grayson Clary discussed the split circuit court opinions on the government’s authority to search electronic devices at the border, focusing on the Eleventh Circuit’s May 23 ruling in United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 6:12 am
ChampagneThe CJEU judgmentThe CJEU substantially followed the AG Opinion, stating that if it tastes like champagne – it is champagne. 1. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Julia Solomon-Strauss, Stephen Szrom
The next session of the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri is currently scheduled to begin Feb. 12. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 12:54 pm
The judges' hands were "somewhat tied" by Nichia v Argos (noted by the IPKat here) which, he considered, removed the judges' ability to apply mandatory procedural controls, such as those proposed in the Burdon Plan. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 12:38 pm
The Court then observed that such multiple claims had been accepted in the United States on a variety of bases, not strictly applicable to the UK or Hong Kong jurisprudence. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:52 am by Liz Campbell
Section 6(3) states that it is immaterial whether a belief is justified or not if it is honestly held. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 9:28 am by Martin George
The Supreme Court of Singapore was the first to refer a question of foreign law to a foreign court (Westacre Investments Inc v The State-Owned Company Yugoimport SDPR (also known as Jugoimport-SDPR) [2009] 2 SLR (R) 166), when it sought a determination of a question of English law. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 9:39 am
The writ appeared in English law several centuries ago, became “an integral part of our common-law heritage” by the time the Colonies achieved independence, Preiser v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:51 am by Graeme Hall
In the courts: Lumba (WL) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 (23 March 2011): Secret foreign nationals detention policy which contradicted published policy was “serious abuse of power”. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 5:15 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Contact us online or by phone at 519-821-5465 to schedule a consultation     [1] English v Manulife [2] Avalon Ford v Evans The post Resignation of Employment appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 1:55 am
What constitutes patentable second medical use is occasionally a subject of dispute, a neat example being Actavis UK Ltd v Merck & Co Inc [2007] EWHC 1311 (Ch), an English Patents Court decision from Mr Justice Warren yesterday, available here on BAILII. [read post]