Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2013, 8:10 am
English: Big Stone Gap, Virginia U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 8:05 am
In Guzzo v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 9:42 am
In the famous case R.A.V. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
The Omnipresent State Sector 552 2. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 5:31 pm
Koontz v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:31 pm
Koontz v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 8:16 am
Walter, and Elizabeth Fajans (2008) Plain English for Lawyers, by Richard C. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:41 pm
This is clearly stated in CPL 710.40[2]. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
Coverage continues of the Court’s decisions in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:13 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
The case of Fisher v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:08 pm
The case of Fisher v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 2:02 pm
This is clearly stated in CPL 710.40[2]. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:58 am
Decision at point 7 (English translation). [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:50 am
De La Garza “realized Gaona–Gomez did not speak English so he spoke to him in Spanish. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm
Malik v Fassenfelt & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 798The idea that an Englishman’s home is his castle is firmly embedded in English folklore and it finds its counterpart in the common law of the realm which provides a remedy to enable the owner of the castle to secure the eviction of trespassers from it. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm
Malik v Fassenfelt & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 798The idea that an Englishman’s home is his castle is firmly embedded in English folklore and it finds its counterpart in the common law of the realm which provides a remedy to enable the owner of the castle to secure the eviction of trespassers from it. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:29 pm
The first case I think is highly relevant is the 1975 California Supreme Court decision of Li v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:04 pm
In the United Kingdom this was memorialized in the Magna Carta—and then deepened during the course of the English civil war of the 17th century (through Coke, an important figure in colonial political jurisprudence) and naturalized among the English colonial population. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]