Search for: "Federal, Inc." Results 4361 - 4380 of 57,584
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2016, 8:18 pm by Kate Howard
The petition of the day is: Principal Investments, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 2:01 pm by Joel Zand
A federal court dismissed Appleā€™s fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) patent licensing claims against Motorola Mobility, Inc. this morning. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 5:30 am by Breyanna Tripp
State and Federal Communications, Inc. wants to take the time out to celebrate the service of U.S. military veterans. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 8:26 am by Naumes Law
Earlier this month, after a nine-day trial an Indiana federal jury ruled in favor of a women who claimed she was damaged by her pelvic mesh implant. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:25 pm by Lisa Perrochet
An opinion from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals last week affirms a trial court ruling that a jury's $1.6 million punitive damages award, on top of a compensatory award of about $280,000 (a 5.7:1 ratio between punitive and compensatory damages), was excessive, in violation of federal due process principles. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 1:13 pm by James Hamilton
 (In re American International Group, Inc. 2008 Securities Litigation, SD NY, No. 08 Civ 4772, Sept. 27, 2010).The court also allowed the action to go forward against AIG's audit firm under alleged Section 11 of the Securities Act violations. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:15 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. is mobilizing its store managers and department supervisors around the country to warn that if Democrats win power in November, they’ll likely change federal law to make it easier for workers to unionize companies — including Wal-Mart. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 3:15 am by Steve Brachmann
Perhaps one of the most widely publicized of these was the January 15 decision in VirnetX Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 11:19 pm
Los Angeles, CA - Trademark attorneys for Coach, Inc. filed a trademark infringement, dilution and unfair competition lawsuit at the Federal District Court in Los Angeles, which also seeks to cancel the trademark registration of the alleged infringer (15 U.S.C. [read post]