Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 4361 - 4380 of 15,516
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2018, 7:46 am by Scott Hervey
Lastly, because de Havilland is a public figure, she had to show that the statements made by FX were made with actual malice. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:13 am
The true figure isn't going to be lower than 3% or higher than 5%. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Similarly, Kennedy’s willingness to join with former Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and David Souter in protecting women’s right to choose in the 1992 Casey decision was important, to put it mildly.Even so, there were more than a few items on the other side of the ledger, including Kennedy’s cowardly vote in Bush v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
It is possible that, in the future, figures will be available for the number of cases issued in the new Media and Communications List which would provide a fuller (although not complete) picture. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
The reference to Gitana v OHIMseems hardly relevant as the argument put to the Court by the applicant (Gitana) was that the mark it applied for had sufficient notoriety so as not to be confused with a similar earlier mark. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 6:08 am by Jamie Markham
The burden is on the defendant to bring forward information about his or her expenses and support obligations, State v. [read post]