Search for: "House v. House"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 41,220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2010, 10:31 am
UK Housing Alliance v Francis [2010] EWCA Civ 117 This is an appeal from a case in Grimsby County Court which we reported on here. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:31 am
UK Housing Alliance v Francis [2010] EWCA Civ 117 This is an appeal from a case in Grimsby County Court which we reported on here. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 5:45 am
Housing Authority v. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 6:02 am
There was also an issue to be tried over whether R(N) v Lewisham applied to accommodation not straightforwardly provided under s.188 Housing Act 1996. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 10:29 am
…. (1) Web 2.0 beware: Fair Housing Counsel of San Fernando Valley v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:10 pm
The consent decree in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 12:19 am
Flexibility v. security I completely understand why landlords like ASTs but I do get annoyed when I read politicians and landlord groups cite AST’s being popular with tenants who want flexibility. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:08 pm
Some cabinet members and White House staff will speak at political fundraisers around the country. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 11:18 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 5:00 pm
The case is Stewart v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 10:45 am
A similar bill was introduced in the House of Representatives about six months ago. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 5:44 am
State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 10:45 am
A similar bill was introduced in the House of Representatives about six months ago. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 11:18 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 3:00 am
The appellant’s appeal to the Inner House was refused. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:53 am
Helena Partnerships Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners (Attorney General intervening): [2012] EWCA Civ 569; [2012] WLR (D) 142 “The provision of housing accommodation was, and could only be, a charitable purpose if it was justified as charitable in respect of the direct benefit provided. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm
There is an interesting post by David Thomas on the Anthony Gold ‘Housing and Public Law’ blog about a settled Judicial Review that highlights this issue.The challenge was to the suitability of temporary accommodation provided as interim accommodation and then provided after acceptance of the full housing duty, so under both s.188 and s.93 Housing Act 1996. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm
There is an interesting post by David Thomas on the Anthony Gold ‘Housing and Public Law’ blog about a settled Judicial Review that highlights this issue.The challenge was to the suitability of temporary accommodation provided as interim accommodation and then provided after acceptance of the full housing duty, so under both s.188 and s.93 Housing Act 1996. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 10:04 am
After Lingle v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 3:33 pm
Further, while child related benefits might be ‘designed to meet the needs of the child’ (R (SG and Others)) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [ 2015 ] UKSC 16 ), this could include the child’s housing costs. [read post]
