Search for: "IN RE GRANT"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 37,596
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2022, 1:00 pm
Each motion was granted in part and denied in part. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 8:08 am
” In re Brownlee, 593 BR 916, 923 (IV) (Bankr. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 4:02 am
Perhaps Judge Rakoff should have considered this possibility before relying on the legal fiction that if a court instruct jurors not to read anything about the case, they won’t, including “push notifications,” even if they’re almost impossible not to notice. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 9:05 pm
There were 457 appeals filed for the first period, with 102 granted and 190 denied. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 3:45 pm
In other words, the Air Force granted these nine exemptions in the last two weeks.} [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 2:12 pm
Simon (Legislative Redistricting) In re B.M. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 11:55 am
In January, a group of North Carolina voters filed a 34-page petition to block Rep. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 9:46 am
In this post, we discuss the potential sea change a decision in In re: A&L Home Care and Training Center, et al. could effect in the Sixth Circuit’s jurisprudence on certification of collectives in the FLSA context. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
Implications In light of its unanimous affirmance, I’m puzzled why the Georgia Supreme Court granted certiorari in this case. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:00 am
You may think that you’re in the clear if you can get the DUI charge dismissed. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
No matter whether one service member is unvaccinated for a medical reason and another unvaccinated for a religious reason, one thing remains the same for both of these service members—they’re both unvaccinated. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
Trial judges are permitted to comment on the evidence to the jury, but in so doing they're supposed to stick to the evidence and particular inferences from it. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 2:20 pm
Defendants cite to In re Allergan PLC Securities Litigation (S.D.N.Y. 2020), where the court granted a portion of a motion to seal because the subject documents contained information about an algorithm that constituted a trade secret. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 10:17 am
We’re not suspending fundamental rights or overriding the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 6:16 am
The goal of the talk, and the accompanying article, is to highlight the special features of our profession that we often take for granted and ignore, and propose ideas to make it not only more impactful and relevant, but also more collegial and fun. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:20 pm
In March 2004 Kent County Council, Re B (A Child) v the Mother & Ors [2004] EWHC 411 (Fam), Sir James Munby set out the classic exposition of the court’s ability to relax or restrain publication via the inherent jurisdiction. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 12:22 pm
Our firm has helped many workers with disabilities to advocate for their rights successfully, and we’re eager to help you. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:47 am
Bottom line My advice to clients is don’t be afraid we’re tilting for or against the police as we work through the issues. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 6:00 am
In re Vaxart, Inc. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 2:01 am
Since we last wrote, Garland gave a major speech about the progress of the federal investigation into the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol—and we’re glad he did. [read post]
