Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S." Results 4361 - 4380 of 182,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2016, 7:41 am by Marcia Zug
A second very interesting presentation from the International Family Law Scholars conference I attended last week was Jill Hasday's presentation on her forthcoming book about deception. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 3:43 pm
(1) You needn't be based in SoCal to enjoy this blog; and (2) You can improve this blog by submitting items of interest. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:31 pm by Jacqueline Lipton
In further preparation for Tim's forthcoming Oscar Trivia, people may be interested in the Golden Globe nominees (often good predictors of the Oscars or so the collective wisdom goes). [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 3:01 pm
Here at Georgia we're exploring fielding a team for the ABA Law Student Division's Negotiation Competition. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:22 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
I don’t know what we are doing right (or wrong) that has everyone interested, but I wanted to thank you for indulging us in flights of fancy–such as this morning’s trip to Apprendi-land. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:12 pm by Greg Siskind
Cecilia didn't get in to a lot of specifics, but my big takeaway was that she is interested in making USCIS operate as transparently as possible. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:06 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This case doesn’t resolve the issue, but it’s an interesting one to contemplate. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 11:21 am
It's an interesting debate . . . [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 11:01 pm by James B. Speta
In my view, The Master Switch is required reading for those interested in Internet and information policy. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 11:02 am by Oliver G. Randl
This case is interesting because there were two interventions the admissibility of which was contested by the patent proprietor. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 5:01 pm
But there’s a case before the Oregon Supreme Court that gets to the heart of an interesting legal debate. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 1:34 pm by Bill
They weren't, but there's no convincing some people.Esmonde's argument is a bit more invidious. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 1:59 am
Sorry, but I wouldn't touch raw milk with a 10-foot straw.I wouldn't drink it, I wouldn't eat it as cheese and I wouldn't take a bath in it, either.Nothing personal, but I don't believe claims that pasteurizing milk destroys its nutritional value or that it's a conspiracy of big agribusiness and big government to promote the interests of big pharma.I see pasteurization of dairy products as a blessing. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 7:55 am by Stewart Baker
That’s interesting because it’s the kind of fact that would be known to Pentagon sources, and one that I haven’t seen reported elsewhere. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 12:30 am
If this were so, any use of it by the defendants would be a serious breach of Allfiled's legal rights and a serious breach of an ex-director's fiduciary duty. [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 11:05 am
The court's analysis was fact-intensive, focusing on the substantial similarity issue. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:17 am
" I didn't elaborate at the time, because it would have been a detour, and also because I thought it would be much more interesting and entertaining to see how much scorn I could incur for saying something that I knew was a cinch to defend.Click for more » [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 11:05 am
But it's about the annual televised Victoria's Secret fashion show.Victoria’s Secret has become emblematic of an outdated kind of sex appeal, one that was sold to women but catered to men. [read post]