Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 12,652
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2016, 10:37 am
Chief Justice Reiber (joined by Justice Eaton) dissents, reasoning [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 7:58 am
The SCOV upholds the Board’s decision.Justice Dooley gets a last word in before the conclusion of the opinion. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 1:35 am
In that regard, it is worth noting that in the Amgen case, Chief Justice John Roberts joined a majority opinion written by Justice Ginsberg where she specifically noted that Congress had amended the securities laws in 1995 without altering the Basic presumption. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
If a nominee violates principles of judicial ethics by giving his views on a case that raises recurring issues, why wouldn’t the same be true for the sitting justices themselves who—in written public opinions and dissents—have given their views in the very same case? [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 11:04 am
In my opinion, the power of Twitter is in who you follow. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
The use of polygraph examinations in the criminal justice system has been contentious. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:53 am
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967). [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
And you know what, they're bullying all these companies and they're bullying our country and they're bullying our leaders and they're doing what? [read post]
3 May 2018, 5:02 am
In re Austin (1835) The court in In re Aust [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 3:59 am
When Wild Bill Douglas wrote the majority opinion in Brady v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:14 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/827443.no1.pdf In Re Personal Restraint of Adolph: The Court held that Mr. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 10:43 am
The not so secret opinion among mediators is that attorneys make settlement more difficult. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 9:10 am
In an opinion delivered by Chief Justice John Roberts, the US Supreme Court reinstated the district court order in favor of PennEast Pipeline. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:50 pm
By focusing on a divergence between Justice Alito’s accurate quote of Alexander Hamilton’s famous dictum from the Federalist No. 78 in his majority opinion and dissenting Justice Breyer’s paraphrase of the same dictum in the Dobbs oral arguments, I expose this divergence. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:52 pm
The section headed “Uncertainty and a Little History” at the outset of Justice Gilbert’s opinion in Burlage certainly seemed to tee the case up for Supreme Court review: We look to legal precedent in deciding cases. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 7:51 am
1(11) is to direct that the re-trial be on the official transcript of the evidence heard at the original trial, together with the exhibits filed. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 8:41 am
"We're very pleased with the opinion,” Gura said. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 9:55 pm
" Chief Justice Josh Morriss III and Justice Bailey C. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 1:31 pm
The new five-Justice majority is also likely to dramatically enhance executive authority, in both foreign and domestic affairs, including by, inter alia, endorsing “unitary executive” theories (rejected by all but one of the Justices on even the Rehnquist Court) and statutory interpretations (see, e.g., the SG's aggressive brief in Lucia) that will constrict agency independence; perhaps re-asserting a more robust nondelegation… [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:48 am
”) In re M.A., 2016-Ohio-1161 (11th Dist.) [read post]
