Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 6,274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2010, 4:37 am
Related PostsJune 25, 2010 -- LGBT Pride: 2009-2010 in Review (2)September 2, 2010 -- Troy Anthony Davis and the Death Penalty (3) [read post]
1 May 2016, 7:32 am
Cleaning up laws v. over-rigidity and lack of nuance. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:22 am
Wilkerson is Of Counsel at Davis & Wilkerson, P.C. [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:02 pm
Ltd v William Davis & Co (Leicester) Ltd [1987] QB 339. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
Students who see themselves as future experts on international arbitration might want to check out the autobiographical piece by Benjamin Davis and NaYoung Kim. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
Davis, and Helvering v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:59 pm
Davis (which found Section 924(c)’s “residual clause” unconstitutional) and earlier this year in Borden v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
See, e.g., Davis v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
See, e.g., Davis v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:49 am
See, e.g., Davis v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:38 pm
Army Judge Advocate General Enoch Crowder, author of the statutory language construed by the Supreme Court to authorize military commissions in the Quirin and Yamashita decisions, found this out in losing McClaughry v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 3:40 am
As the Davis Court acknowledged by citing Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:41 am
Davis of the Eastern District of Virginia. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:00 am
Davis. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:00 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:26 am
Pliler and Davis v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 4:33 am
Davis, a case the court recently agreed to review that asks “when the law allows lawyer incompetence to lead to an execution. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 8:19 pm
Meanwhile, and in utter disregard of the principle of equality under law, the State of Texas is refusing to apply the principles and decision of Mexico v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:49 pm
We have previously noted that when a statute imposes criminal liability for knowingly disregarding a risk, it does not require a particular outcome or actions aimed at a specific individual; the crime is solely defined by the risk of injury produced by defendant's conduct (see, People v Davis, 72 NY2d 32, 36-37). [read post]
