Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 6,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 8:23 pm
In addition, the United States' amicus brief also represents HUD's interpretation of the ILSA warranting Skidmore deference. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
Here is the question the petition sought to raise: “Whether, in a habeas corpus action brought by an individual held in United States territory, including Guantanamo, (a) Munaf v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 7:26 am
Rule 702 should have settled the debate over Daubert, as this rule for the admissibility of expert testimony is far stricter than any rule that existed in any jurisdiction in the United States before Daubert came out. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
The justices held 5-4 in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:13 pm
” For that part of its ruling, the state court majority relied in part upon a comment the Supreme Court had made in its controversial campaign finance decision last year in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 2:00 am
In AIDS Healthcare Foundation v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:09 am
” Taking private lands in the name of economic development is something we are more likely to see in places such as Venezuela or Cuba, not the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 11:35 am
Today, they filed an appeal with the highest court in the land, the United States Supreme Court, to try and stop the execution of John Richard Marek. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 4:14 pm
(Neighbors For Fair Planning v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am
Hitchcock and Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:04 pm
Trades Council v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 5:02 am
Like it or not, there is not now, nor has there ever really been, only one law of the land in the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 12:00 am
New London, the United States Supreme Court upheld the transfer of private property to a private developer as part of an economic development plan. [read post]
20 May 2010, 7:41 pm
Supreme Court to rule on eminent domain case summarizes the background in City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
To be clear: Charles V (aka Carlos V) was the monarch in power over the realm comprising both of the lands that today are Belgium and Mexico. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:38 am
In addition, the presence of non-standard items did not mean that the authority could not currently produce a unit cost figure. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:56 pm
[Rhonda V. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 3:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 11:58 am
As a result, two of our clients have been effectively banned from traveling from the United States to be with their families in Ireland and Yemen. [read post]
