Search for: "Laws v. Laws"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 269,246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2009, 2:30 am
Office of Fair Trading v Foxtons Ltd Court of Appeal “An injunction granted in a general challenge by the Office of Fair Trading against the unfairness of certain clauses in an estate agent's standard terms could extend to the continuing use of unfair terms in an existing contract. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:00 am
Gibson and Others v Sheffield City Council Court of Appeal “Merely because an employer could explain a pay disparity, which was not directly discriminatory, that did not necessarily mean that the pay practice was not tainted by sex discrimination, so that the employer would have to justify that disparity objectively in order to rely on the genuine material factor defence in an equal pay claim. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 3:27 am
Mitchell and Another v Glasgow City Council House of Lords “Local housing authority landlords were under no duty to warn a neighbour who had received death threats from an abusive tenant that a meeting had been arranged at which he was warned that he would be evicted unless his behaviour improved, after which the abusive tenant inflicted [...] [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 1:52 am
CL (Vietnam) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Where an unaccompanied child seeking asylum appealed against the refusal of his claim and removal directions, it was necessary for the immigration judge, when considering that child's human rights, to determine whether the reception facilities for the child on return were adequate. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 2:52 am
McInnes v HM Advocate Supreme Court “When considering whether a criminal conviction in Scotland should be overturned because of a failure by the Crown to disclose witness statements to the defence, the question for the High Court of Justiciary to consider was whether, taking all the circumstances of the trial into account, there was a real possibility that the jury would have arrived at a different verdict if the material had been available. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:08 am
Raja v Van Hoogstraten (No 9) Court of Appeal “Since the introduction of the Civil Procedure Rules, applications for the setting aside of orders made without notice were governed by rule 23.10, and determined by the court exercising the discretion given by that rule in accordance with the overriding objective to do justice. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:40 am
Slack and Others v Cumbria County Council Court of Appeal “A variation in the terms of an employment contract between an employer and employee in a stable employment relationship did not terminate the preexisting contract so as to trigger the beginning of the six-month period allowed for initiating equal pay claims. [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:05 am
Bank Mellat v HM Treasury Court of Appeal “Where, in civil proceedings in which a litigant’s rights to a fair trial under article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights applied, irreducible minimum rights were required to be accorded the litigant to be given sufficient information of the evidential case against him, to enable him to give effective instructions concerning the essential allegations against him. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:34 am
Regina (Shields) v Secretary of State for Justice Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “The Secretary of State for Justice did have power and jurisdiction to consider granting a pardon under the Royal Prerogative in respect of a person convicted and sentenced in a foreign court but transferred to the United Kingdom to serve his sentence. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 2:29 am
Pitt and Another v Holt and Another Chancery Division “A receiver appointed under the Mental Health Act 1983 by the Court of Protection was entitled to set aside a settlement made by her, as receiver for her late husband, where the inheritance tax position had not been taken into account when the settlement was established. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 4:53 am
Bee and Another v Thompson Court of Appeal “A right of way for agricultural purposes reserved only under a testamentary disposition of two properties by the testatrix, who had owned those two properties, did not impliedly reserve a right to increase the use for residential purposes without the agreement of all parties. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:25 am
Wandsworth London Borough Council v Webb Court of Appeal “It was not reasonable to make a possession order against a secure tenant on the ground that her son, who no longer lived with her, had been prosecuted and acquitted on three occasions of breaching an antisocal behaviour order. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:12 am
Yearworth and Others v North Bristol NHS Trust Court of Appeal “A sample of sperm from a person undergoing chemotherapy, which a hospital stored in case he became infertile after the treatment, was that person's property and its loss or damage was capable of establishing a claim in negligence. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 3:06 am
Ali v Birmingham City Council Court of Appeal “The words ‘inform’ and ‘notify’ did not necessarily mean the same thing. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 3:07 pm
( The Hill) The Supreme Court on Monday narrowly reversed a controversial decision written by President Obama’s nominee to join the body, giving conservative groups a chance to take issue with Judge Sonia Sotomayor even as her confirmation looks increasingly likely.Justices reversed the Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Ricci v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:35 am
Birmingham City Council v Dixon Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “Evidence of a defendant's antisocial behaviour which occurred after the making of an application for an antisocial behaviour order against him was admissible when a court was determining (i) whether a defendant had acted in an antisocial manner and (ii) whether it was necessary to make an [...] [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:51 am
Barber v Croydon London Borough Council Court of Appeal “A local housing authority had acted unreasonably in seeking possession against a mentally impaired tenant for anti-social behaviour when it failed to take into account the possibility that his behaviour might have been produced by his mental impairment. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 3:24 am
Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd Queen’s Bench Division “An article which attracted qualified privilege when printed in a newspaper could lose that privilege if its electronic form was kept on the paper's website after circumstances had changed but the article was not modified to reflect that change in facts. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 9:35 pm
O'Connor, Professor of Law at the University of Washington School of Law; and Susan Warshaw Ebner of Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, PC, will address the Stanford v.... [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
Here: The Belloni Decision: A Foundation for the Northwest Fisheries Cases, the National Tribal Sovereignty Movement, and an Understanding of the Rule of Law Charles Wilkinson Judge Belloni’s decision in United States v. [read post]
