Search for: "Louisiana Supreme Court" Results 4361 - 4380 of 6,294
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
But after a wild and unbelievable litigation path – which involved a lawmaker threatening to impeach the state supreme court and the governor asserting that she was not required to follow the supreme court's ruling – the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled that the execution could proceed in a cloud of secrecy. [read post]
Supreme Court that will hopefully determine whether Title VII protects employees from discrimination based on their sexual orientation or gender identity. [read post]
Supreme Court that will hopefully determine whether Title VII protects employees from discrimination based on their sexual orientation or gender identity. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am by Kelly Goles
Supreme Court: Original Jurisdiction and Oral Arguments, and Domestic Violence: Resources in the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 9:49 am
SCOTUSBlog reports that the US Supreme Court's ruling in the Kennedy case out of Lousiana bars states from legislating the death penalty for the crime of child rape "when the victim does not die and death was not intended. [read post]
29 May 2008, 9:32 am
Steele of the Supreme Court of Delaware, “Delaware’s Guidance: Ensuring Equity for the Modern Witenagemot,” 2 Virginia Law & Business Review 189 (2007), previously explored here, and a subject of the Chief Justice’s keynote luncheon address to the Business Law Section at the ABA’s 2007 annual meeting. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
He lives with his wife and two young sons in Metairie, Louisiana. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 3:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
In other words, the district court was worried her presence would compromise "[t]he generic risk of jurors overhearing prejudicial remarks," a concern the Supreme Court has explicitly held cannot override a defendant's constitutional right to a public trial absent more specific findings. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am by John Elwood
As construed by the Supreme Court in Mansell v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 7:35 am
Rather he sees court decisions as establishing a “uniform rule” for society as a whole – something that could not happen unless court decisions (especially decisions of the “one supreme tribunal”) were not regarded as authoritative statements of the law by other governmental actors…. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
  Doing the most potential damage, long term, was the court’s ruling on preemption, an issue that has now been appealed to the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:44 am
 A "unique" case that was recently remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama is detailed by Craig N. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:24 am by Joe May
Lobbying “The Solution to Lobbying is More Lobbying” by Lee Drutman for Washington Post Massachusetts: “Baker Inaugural Committee Returning Donations That Exceeded Limit” by Sara Morrison for Boston Globe New York: “JCOPE to Staff up as Duties Expand” by Chris Bragg for Albany Times Union Campaign Finance “States Can Ban Elected Judges from Asking for Campaign Money, Supreme Court Says” by David Savage for Los Angeles Times Florida:… [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
Dave's recent post was kind enough not to dwell on my brief report of the now-renounced Temple Law Review [Update: Make that the TULANE Law Review] article referenced therein, which attempted to link the voting records of Louisiana Supreme Court justices with campaign contributions from relevant litigants and their lawyers. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
” by Graham Moomaw for Virginia Mercury Ethics National: “Trump Asks Supreme Court to Review Decision Granting Congress Access to His Financial Records” by Robert Barnes (Washington Post) for Danbury News Times National: “The Accidental Celebrities of the Impeachment Inquiry” by Katherine Rosman for New York Times Florida: “‘This Is Big’: City of Tallahassee ethics package passes amid challenging year, FBI probe” by Karl Etters… [read post]
30 May 2014, 5:06 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Georgia limited the death penalty to murder, and the Supreme Court struck down most of the others in Coker v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 5:30 am
The point is, this is an almost-textbook example of bipartisanship, something that's been sorely lacking in the national "debate" on the issue.It will be interesting to see how the Supreme Court resolves this obvious conflict between the current administration and the 10th Amendment. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 3:06 pm
[Los Angeles Times] * Louisiana asks the Supreme Court to reconsider its ruling striking down the death penalty for the crime of child rape. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:16 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Oregon (1972), the Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment requires unanimity for a verdict — but that the Fourteenth Amendment does not carry this rule over to the states, and that even 9–3 verdicts are constitutionally permissible. [read post]