Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 4,608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2018, 4:40 pm
From Paul E. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
Harking back to a time before fax, email, and before any of our intellectual property laws in the UK existed in their present form, when neither OHIM nor the EPO existed and WIPO was but a babe, he reminisced thus:WHERE ARE WE v WHERE I THOUGHT WE’D BE My first taste of IP came in 1973, when I found myself researching for a PhD on ownership of IP rights. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:03 am
Path. et al. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:53 am
In Van Cleef & Arpels Logistics, S.A. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 11:42 am
The ROSS v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
Music Broadcast Pvt. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:53 am
David Carson, US Copyright Office: Small claims of all kinds are problems in federal court; one argument that might be helpful is that, at the moment, you have no choice but federal court for copyright claims; often people have state court as an alternative, which may depending on the state be more efficient/faster/cheaper. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Flava Works, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 7:16 am
The State charged him with felony incest, and he pleaded guilty. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:03 pm
(See Grimshaw v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:29 am
The court declined to exercise jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s state law claim under the New York Labor Law, which was unaffected by the FLSA exemption that sent the plaintiff’s federal claims into foul territory (Chen v Major League Baseball, March 26, 2014, Koeltl, J). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:11 am
Indeed, on the FDIC’s website page providing information about the agency’s litigation efforts, the FDIC states that as of January 18, 2012, the FDIC has authorized suits in connection with 44 failed institutions against 391 individuals for D&O liability with damage claims of at least $7.7 billion. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:14 am
Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:05 am
A. in Wood Estate v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:03 am
The most recent case that I was able to find is a 2007 case, Daskalov v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 1:28 pm
Rick Bickhram: And I think you hit the nail right on the head there, Dave, because in the majority decision there, which was by Justice Feldman, he pretty much states that one of the estate trustees were aware of the action going on throughout the process of the litigation. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:11 am
In Employment Division v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:33 am
She taught math, language arts, social studies, science, gym, art, and music, using non-religious textbooks. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 10:38 am
Standard Knitting v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am
Michael Landon (“Little Joe Cartwright”) being served with a subpoena (1968) Another useful Townsend post addresses a common issue — the Government’s attempt to muzzle the recipients of subpoenas: In United States v. [read post]
