Search for: "Matter of Bright" Results 4361 - 4380 of 5,399
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2011, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
It is no longer sufficient for a federal court to find a reversible error in the trial, no matter how egregious. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
It is no longer sufficient for a federal court to find a reversible error in the trial, no matter how egregious. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:59 am by Marie Louise
Highlights this week included: Slammed by judge, ACS:Law not allowed to drop file-sharing cases: Media C.A.T. v Adams (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) (1709 Copyright Blog) (The Bright Spark) (Techdirt) Competition trumps IP in footie decoder pub brawl: Football Association Premier League Ltd & Others v QC Leisure & Others, Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (IPKat) (1709 Blog) (1709 Blog) (IPKat) (Azrights) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these… [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 6:58 am by Mandelman
No one is pro-scammer, mind you… everyone hates the idea of a homeowner being scammed out of money when at risk of losing a home, or at any time, for that matter. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 8:44 pm by Brady Iandiorio
Jan 27, 2011), the prospect of resolving coverage issues in Colorado seemed bright. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:29 pm by SOIssues
It matters not whether an offender is convicted of violent rape or public indecency, lumping all offenders into one group and then dumping them into seeming virtual concentration camps is all the rage among lawmakers. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Usually, that posture on your company’s approach is a matter of corporate culture. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 11:49 am by Ken Lopez
 Bright and even animated words on the page are not automatically relevant. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am by The Legal Blog
In this view of the matter, it has become imperative to examine what are the contours of the public interest litigation? [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 4:52 am
 The Supreme Court held that the Chancery Court erred as a matter of law when it held that the purpose of plaintiff’s demand to inspect books and records — to assist in bolstering demand futility allegations in a parallel shareholder derivative complaint filed in a California federal court — was improper. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:19 am by Buce
   On the other hand, if you are not really bound for the profession anyway, how much does it matter? [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 5:59 pm by Frank Pasquale
These values are not solely a matter of satisfying personal preferences. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
One can of course debate about particular matters, for instance abortion, capital punishment, and the like. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:08 am by A. Benjamin Spencer
To the ex- tent that Jordan and Bright urge Ortiz has not proved her case, they were, by their own account, obliged to raise that sufficiency-of-the- evidence issue by postverdict motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(b). [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:57 am
So Hamilton came up with the bright idea of taxing alcohol. [read post]