Search for: "Miller, in the Matter of"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 5,116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2010, 6:54 am
For this representation, David received the Equal Justice Award in 2004 from Community Legal Services.David frequently lectures about trial tactics and intellectual property matters. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:43 am
” Miller v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 11:02 pm
The matter reached the Supreme Court, and last week, Georgia's highest court delivered its long-awaited verdict - Capping damages in this manner violates a citizen’s right to trial by jury. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 6:41 am
" The court, in quoting the case of Matter of Miller Family Ltd. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 6:41 am
The court, in quoting the case of Matter of Miller Family Ltd. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:07 pm
Six of which cited the case for its procedural holding.(4) See Barry Miller and Casey Stansbury, Iqbal Energizes Motion to Dismiss Practice (March 10, 2010) (discussing Iqbal’s influence in state court matters).(5) In Siemens Financial Services, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 7:10 am
Miller. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 1:55 pm
MOLLY MILLER, Defendant and Appellant. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 12:22 pm
The SEC has charged Vaughan and his entities with various securities violations and continues to investigate the matter. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:45 pm
DOWD is a partner in Dunnington Bartholow & Miller LLP, a New York firm founded in 1921. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 10:10 am
As a matter of fact, I have hired someone formerly from the state attorney general’s office in Texas, Mark Tobey who’s here today, who specializes in agriculture. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 6:49 pm
It would show “enormously bad judgment to pursue those matters, Leibowitz said. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 10:55 am
When I read this part of the paper, my first thought was: What about the Modigliani-Miller Theorem? [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:54 am
” Miller v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:19 pm
The case is Miller v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:11 pm
Miller, 425 U.S. 435, 443, 96 S.Ct. 1619, 1624, 48 L.Ed.2d 71 (1976). . . . [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 8:12 am
If we focused on sensible federalism policy, then is it not obvious that the right answer, as a matter of sound federalism-and-rights policy, is (3)? [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:29 am
NOTE TO CONSUMERS: As a matter of Firm policy, JMBM does not represent individual consumers who have disputes with their lenders. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:01 am
Sure, they matter a lot to the parties involved and there’s always an incentive to deputize the government to put a thumb on the scale of that dispute, but that’s not a matter of allocative efficiency, and not a matter for the antitrust laws. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 5:22 pm
This is an extremely serious matter and the attorney general will have to address it. [read post]
