Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 4,555
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2008, 4:22 am
In Levitt Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
Q: Tell us about some favorite advertising cases. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 4:23 pm
Why precisely not? [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:32 am
I believe that an objective examination of the facts will show that this is precisely how John Yoo understood his role. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:13 pm
In Asphalt Paving Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:05 am
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, which must be identified by Department of Homeland Security docket number ICEB-2008-0002, using one of the following methods: Federal Rulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 12:23 pm
Fair use addresses many of the down sides of the strict liability standard. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 6:52 pm
"By now it is no surprise that Linda Greenhouse will be leaving us for academia. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 12:47 pm
“By now it is no surprise that Linda Greenhouse will be leaving us for academia. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 6:40 pm
Of course, only empirical research could ascertain what impact, if any, the ability to contract for an expanded standard of review would have on the level of use of arbitration. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 2:48 pm
Though I wish the ruling was just an April Fool's joke, I fear the a Fourth Circuit opinion today in US v. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP),EU: Counterfeit medicines in the EU: a new consultation: (Class 46)Thailand US Trade Representative to ‘talk’ to Thai government: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), US: Cellectis SA files suit against Precision BioSciences, alleging infringement of two patents relating to materials used to make genome modifications in certain types of organisms: (IP Law360), US: PharmaBiotech IP Summit… [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:29 am
See McNellis v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 6:11 am
This post focuses on the limitations that the ADA imposes on such testing, and concludes that the Seventh Circuit’s approach to the issue in Karraker v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 11:08 pm
" [17] Van Gorkom The next case is Smith v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 5:48 am
Second, the standard Tampa plea-agreement had a "grand jury co-operation" clause, and Dr. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:01 am
:The BMI works well for research purposes, but doesn’t necessarily translate precisely to the individual. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 12:31 am
Circuit Court in Ollman v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Ourreview of the record and of Georgia law persuades us the Masons cannotshoulder that burden. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 3:04 am
In Micron Tech. v. [read post]
