Search for: "People v David S." Results 4361 - 4380 of 5,862
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2011, 1:18 pm by Trent
Rather than focus on the case, which was Lockheed Martin v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
This first prong is subjective, focusing on the inventor's personal preferences as of the application's filing date. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:50 am by SHG
  Under the 9th Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 9:30 am by azatty
It has turned into a major constitutional showdown with national implications for how states may police public officials who face a potential conflict of interest in conducting the peoples business. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm by Frank Pasquale
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:06 am by James Bickford
   Briefly:      At the Volokh Conspiracy, David Kopel has an extensive discussion of a recent cert. petition challenging Maryland’s de facto ban on the transportation of handguns. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
  It is, perhaps, worth recalling that last year’s Reuter’s Institute Report on “Privacy, Probity and Public Interest” (almost entirely ignored by the media) showed that most people still regard sex and sexuality as essentially private. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:22 pm by Lisa McElroy
The Court’s second decision last week, in Sossamon v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 9:17 am by Charon QC
Prime Minister David Cameron’s statement on Thursday last on privacy law – described by David Allen Green in our Without Prejudice podcast as ‘legally illiterate’ (rightly) – continues to arouse ridicule, hyperventilation by those who support him,  and sane critical legal analysis by people who do actually know what they are talking about. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 6:18 am by Bill Raftery
The threats to impeach 4 Iowa Supreme Court justices for their same-sex marriage decision (Varnum v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:18 pm by Glenn Reynolds
I don’t know how many of these people might be alive today if just one of the several hundred people locked in Norris Hall had a weapon, but I do know that all of these people had a right to life and a right to defend it. [read post]