Search for: "People v Long" Results 4361 - 4380 of 18,867
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm by Jeffrey Vlasek
  We've noted a number of such cases in recent weeks but take, for example, the recent decision of Cordy v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 12:53 am by Jeremy
PPL was not particularly sympathetic, submitting that there had been a long history of failures by Fletcher, and that it was also entitled to damages in respect of his copyright infringement. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 9:09 am by Dave Maass
" The action prompted thousands of people to contact their members of Congress about NSA surveillance. [read post]
22 May 2014, 1:44 pm by Sandy Levinson
  What is most pervasive, perhaps, is the ever extending polarization, which means not only that "We the People" have strikingly different views on a plethora of important topics, but, perhaps more importantly, that there is no longer a genuine "We the People" because each of the polarized sides increasingly sees their opponents not as fellow citizens but as Others to be demonized. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:27 am by Florian Mueller
Today I wish to draw some additional attention to long-time web browser developer Alex Russell's new post, Apple Is Not Defending Browser Engine Choice. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 6:48 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals holds that a Long Island ordinance that prohibited people from soliciting work on the side of the road violates the First Amendment. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:27 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case involves the interpretation of a little-known federal statute intended to protect public artistic endeavors.The case is Kerson v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 4:23 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  [Note: in Washington state, the legal threshold is 5 ng/ml.]In People v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 12:31 pm
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000Read More [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 1:27 am by Chijioke Okorie
Late in September, a High Court in Gauteng Division ruled on a motion filed by BlindSA in Blind SA v Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition (14996/21) challenging the constitutionality of South Africa's current Copyright Act on the grounds that the statute limits people with visual and print disabilities from accessing copyright-protected materials in formats such as Braille, among others. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
It popped up in a recent Tax Court case, Mitsubishi Cement Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:59 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court has even allowed people to speak their mind on offensive or socially unacceptable speech. [read post]