Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 14,924
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2012, 8:59 am
New York courts have interpreted § 684(3)(c) to mean in essence that the sale of the first franchise unit is exempt from registration if the unit was only offered to a maximum of two people (See BMW Co., Inc. et al. v Workbench Inc. et al. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 10:24 pm
The case stems from an explosion injuring several people. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 6:47 pm
Huntington Ingalls Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:02 am
StonCor Group, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 1:53 am
In Bender v. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 10:03 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 10:35 am
The Texas Supreme Court interpreted yet another confused mineral reservation in a deed in the case of Van Dyke v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 1:48 pm
The dispute, Alabama Association of Realtors v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 8:55 am
In Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 2:02 pm
The Nevada Supreme Court has upheld an earlier ruling in Bahena v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 2:20 am
Haringey LBC v Theobald. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 2:20 am
Haringey LBC v Theobald. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
All installments in this series are collected in the Rakofsky v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
That wouldn't be unusual except that in Bagley v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 6:51 am
Application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:05 am
Application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 1:46 pm
V. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:31 pm
In State of Louisiana v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:23 am
Izquierdo v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 11:53 pm
The First Amendment grants freedom of speech, and the patent system, which makes knowledge of inventions publicly available, does not foreclose people from speaking about the knowledge in the patents. [read post]
