Search for: "People v. House"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 11,170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2012, 1:33 pm
(Goleta Union School Dist. v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:55 pm
Williams v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:42 am
Until I read the 8th District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 3:08 am
The case is Health Care & Retirement Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 9:30 am
The CDC provides guidance for shared or congregate housing, and multifamily housing (e.g., condominiums and townhouses). [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Occasionally, there have been calls for businesses to simply not deal with certain people at the outset—consider Castaneda v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
Conclusion I think this case does have some relevance to housing law. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:26 am
Elsea v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 11:12 am
See People v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 12:22 pm
The case was Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Plus, I don’t have anything else to write about, so today I’m going to crib from Stu and highlight US v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 12:48 pm
” United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm
At least in the UK, as the Government continues to nudge us in the direction of something resembling pre-Covid normality, the number of people wearing face masks outside of the home has inevitably increased. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:37 am
One explanation for this pattern is that Biden’s White House is staffed by progressive ideologues.... [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 12:30 pm
That was the question the Sixth Circuit had to answer in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 11:30 am
We the People, Vol. 3: The Civil Rights RevolutionBruce Ackerman (2014, Belknap Press) Ackerman, a professor of law and political science at Yale University, focuses on the events and laws that shaped the civil rights era and helped to end Jim Crow, starting with the 1954 Brown v. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 6:39 am
Safer bet for a service animalGill Terrace Retirement Apartments v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:45 pm
In 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the use of Section 702 in United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 2:31 pm
That was, of course, the story of the impeachment of President Trump bu the US House of Representatives. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:51 am
The only reason to oppose this bill is as a back-door means of criminalizing youthful gay relations, since after Lawrence v. [read post]
