Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 178,510
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
”Following that incident, said the court, "AFD determined that [Plaintiff’s] promotion to battalion chief would undermine the AFD’s internal morale and its public perception, as well as [Plaintiff’s] effectiveness as a leader. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
Luckily, the court’s analysis is generally consistent with NAD’s analysis and bolsters the tips we outlined last week. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:44 am
We nevertheless affirm the Appellate Division’s order on alternative grounds. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Farmabase, the state court issued a trial judgment last month denying the plaintiff’s claim for relief. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
The pharmacist refused to dispense plaintiff's prescription for the emergency contraceptive ella because of his conscientious objection to dispensing any medication that prevents the implantation of a fertilized egg. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 10:01 pm
The court allowed plaintiffs to file an amended complaint on this one issue. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:55 pm
The Supreme Court ruled today that a plaintiff's challenge to his inclusion on the N0-Fly List was not moot even after the government removed him from the List, because the government didn't adequately establish that it wouldn't re-list him in... [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:32 pm
FCA argued its third 998 offer precluded plaintiff from recovering attorney fees incurred after its 998 offer date and moved to tax plaintiff’s costs accordingly. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:17 pm
Imagine if instead of being the plaintiffs in the underlying lawsuit, Breen and Mezzetta were the defendants. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:43 pm
The plaintiffs are seeking $5m in damages and health monitoring costs. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:13 pm
As Guadamuz notes: “A recurring theme in ongoing copyright infringement cases has been the use of training content disclosure by plaintiffs, those who have disclosed training data have tended to be on the receiving end of suits. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 11:42 am
At this time, non-exempt reporting companies outside the Northern District of Alabama that are not plaintiffs in this case remain subject to the CTA. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 11:31 am
“Indeed, the jury expressly found that Plaintiff did not commit rape and, as demonstrated below, Defendant George Stephanopoulos was aware of the jury’s finding in this regard yet still falsely stated otherwise,” [Trump’s attorney, Alejandro] Brito continued....ADDED: The complaint quotes 12 times that Stephanopoulos said "rape," so he really leaned into what he had to know was wrong: [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 10:47 am
The deductible is there to disincentivize plaintiffs and counsel for bringing lawsuits for de minimis injuries, and that’s a good thing both for insurers and for plaintiff counsel working on contingency. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 9:52 am
He also testified that plaintiff’s condition was permanent and would require pain medication indefinitely. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 9:48 am
The 5th Circuit’s requirement that a plaintiff provide evidence that someone who engaged in similar conduct but had not engaged in protected speech was not arrested would make the Nieves carve-out “effectively irrebuttable,” she insists. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 8:28 am
The trial court denied the theme park’s motion, and this appeal followed. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 8:09 am
Here’s the court’s entire Section 230 “analysis” (as opposed to where its recap of the parties’ arguments): plaintiff has set forth sufficient facts with regard to each defendant to allege viable causes of action under a products liability theory. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 7:01 am
The court noted that “the parties and Birnbaum agree that the methodology’s purpose is to determine what return Plaintiffs should receive. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 6:53 am
I wonder if Congress even thought about this when it enacted the three-strikes rule.The second lawsuit, referred to as the Titone litigation, was dismissed because plaintiff did not comply with Rule 8's pleading requirements, and plaintiff was given the opportunity to re-plead the case. [read post]
