Search for: "Small v. United States" Results 4361 - 4380 of 7,088
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am by Kevin Kaufman
The revenue thresholds may be designed around companies like Google and Facebook, but Maryland businesses—including many small businesses—are the ones actually paying. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 11:00 am by Joseph L. Hyde
In an opinion essay published on Monday in the Washington Post, President Biden, called for a constitutional amendment to overrule the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
’” The examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused to register the proposed mark on the ground the phrase falsely suggests a connection with a person (here Donald Trump) in violation of Lanham Act Section 2(a), and also because this mark violates Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:56 pm by Duncan Hollis
 These treaties, however, represent a clear counter-example to my claim; the U.K., Australia and the United States all expressly recorded their mutual understanding of how the United States would regard these treaties as a matter of domestic law. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:06 am by admin
(internal cites deleted) DiQuisto v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:30 am by Taylor Gulatsi
In 1938, Congress established a nine-person Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise Committee with representatives from the United States House of Representatives, the United States Senate, and the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 10:57 am by Gerald Ferguson
Cookies are small units of code that website operators can send to Internet browsers accessing their sites. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 7:10 am by jn92
In this case, the source is a set of books published by the United States government that contains the opinions of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Mark Walsh
Amex was sued by the United States and several states, who argued that the anti-steering provisions in its contracts with merchants violate federal antitrust law. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 2:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Defendant cites the recent United States Supreme Court decision of Jose Padilla v Kentucky, 130 S. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Judgment: approach and general principles The ECtHR starts by observing that only a very small number of Council of Europe member States provide for public access to taxation data, a fact which raises issues regarding the margin of appreciation which Finland enjoys when providing and regulating public access to such data. [read post]