Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 4361 - 4380
of 13,581
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2016, 7:19 am
Stam, & Michael C. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 6:41 am
Securities and Exchange CommissionThe reappointed members of the Committee are:Stephen Holmes, General Partner Emeritus, InterWest PartnersBarbara Roper, Director of Investor Protection, Consumer Federation of AmericaKurt Schacht, Managing Director, CFA InstituteAnne Sheehan, Director of Corporate Governance, California State Teachers’ Retirement SystemDamon Silvers, Director of Policy and Special Counsel, AFL-CIOThe new and reappointed members will… [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 11:46 am
The 1999 case of R. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 8:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 10:20 am
Ct. 1101 (2015) and FTC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:54 am
In that case, Stuart C. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:26 am
Besides yesterday's Opinion of AG Wathelet, another recent example that comes to mind is the Opinion of AG Szpunar in Vereniging Openbare Bibliotheken v Stichting Leenrecht, C-174/15 [the 'e-lending case', currently in progress and noted here], in which he clearly stated [para 34] that "the principal objective of copyright is to safeguard the interests of authors".Secondly, should the CJEU follow the Opinion of AG… [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:17 am
United States of America v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 8:07 am
By R. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 7:33 am
In a published opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 5:28 am
The Ninth Circuit has handed down United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
R v Stephan, 2016 ABQB 353 [7] When the impact of this offence is considered, the Court considers how the commission of the offence by Mr. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 11:57 pm
Also the case of R v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:39 am
ESRT Empire State Building, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 8:08 am
IDEA, Section 601(c). [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:45 am
R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 23-24 November 2015. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:39 am
Mr Justice Sales stated that although there was an “interference” under ECHR, art 8(1), this was justified under ECHR, art 8(2) as proportionate. [read post]
2 Jul 2016, 3:33 pm
§ 2701(c)). [read post]
2 Jul 2016, 3:33 pm
§ 2701(c)). [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 6:05 pm
Jeffrey C. [read post]
