Search for: "State v. Dominic"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 4,510
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2007, 12:18 pm
Chinese anti-monopoly law ("AML") was enacted on August 30, 2007, which is the first comprehensive competition law in China's history. [1] The Chinese AML was drafted within the context of three principal competition concerns: regional monopolies (local protection); sectoral monopolies by Chinese firms, including state-owned enterprises (administrative monopoly); and a perception of alleged abuses of dominant positions by some multinationals.[2] Even though the EU… [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 6:15 pm
However, now they hesitate to lend to the later starters since there seems to be higher risk of non-payment and, therefore, the later starters only get satellites themselves and related rights and licenses.[23] Obviously, the telecommunication industry or satellite related industries are dominated by big companies which are able to afford those risks or convince financiers to lend to them. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 1:04 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 10:59 am
… Via john v burke, with thanks. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:11 pm
Vitale, prohibiting school prayer, Reynolds v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 6:36 am
Stateat Miami (Fla.)+ 1221-2419-16LWin overtimeIowa at Northwestern+ 127-2128-17WWthreeinterceptionsWake Forestat Virginia- 1 1/221-2416-17WWViriginia again1-point victorBall Stateat Indiana+ 6 1/241-4420-38WLHoosiersbowl eligibleClemsonat Duke- 1644-1447-10WW23rd straightACC loss by DukeVanderbiltat Florida+ 1614-3522-49WWHarvinhas big dayNebraskaat Kansas+ 17 1/228-2739-76LLMost points everagainst HuskersKansas Stateat Iowa State- 1421-1720-31LWK-State loses but… [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 12:50 pm
Roe v Wade's trimester is one good example, and its stability became an open question after years of apparent precedential force. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 3:48 pm
As the courtroom saga unfolds, M&A players and practitioners should keep a watchful eye – not since In re IBP Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:47 am
Sachs Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 9:49 am
Until the appellate courts see fit to revisit the issue, it is likely to remain the dominant theory in Connecticut state courts and at the CHRO. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 1:01 am
Supreme Court in 2005 upended the federal sentencing guidelines in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 12:31 am
The decision will have implications for "any company that has a dominant position protected by a proprietary interoperability model between platforms where competitors exist. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 2:54 am
Examples: state action doctrine. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 1:23 pm
Access and the Regulatory State C. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 5:38 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit announced in Broadcom Corp. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:05 am
Our prediction of winners: 1-1, against the spread 1-1ThursdayKentucky v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 9:20 am
Our prediction of winners: 1-1, against the spread 1:1ThursdayKentucky v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 3:59 pm
[5] Dora v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
Although defined by the American Psychiatric Association as persons with a dominant sexual desire for pre-pubescent children, the pedophile tag now applies to any person who every entertained a sexual desire or had a sexual incident, however minor, with anyone under 18. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
It is Mr. 2 001.240 State v. [read post]