Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 4361 - 4380 of 9,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2014, 1:50 pm
Counting both federal and state court decisions, it’s the seventeenth consecutive judicial win for same-sex marriage advocates since the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 11:45 am by Dennis Crouch
In reality, what we have are poorly informed musings of a young district court judge grappling with one of his first patent cases. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:52 am by Amy Howe
In the first case, the state asked the Supreme Court to weigh in on a ruling by a three-judge district court striking down the state’s map on the ground that 28 majority-black districts were the product of racial gerrymandering, in violation of the U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
This morning the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Merit Management Group v. [read post]
25 Sep 2021, 11:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Well, "The State Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial Circuit ultimately determined Webb had a valid defense to the charges under the First Amendment and, as such, dropped the charges against him. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:12 am by Maxwell Kennerly
  * * * Fourth Circuit: "[T]o survive a motion to dismiss, the complaint must 'state[ ] a plausible claim for relief' that 'permit[s] the court to infer more than the mere possibility of misconduct' based upon 'its judicial experience and common sense.' Ashcroft v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm by Anna Salvatore, Benjamin Wittes
District Court for the District of Columbia Judge Rudolph Contreras, but the case was reassigned to Sullivan’s court following Contreras’s recusal.In a subsequent colloquy, Flynn maintained and reiterated his guilty plea. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:01 am
The case was State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 7:49 am by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
First, and perhaps most importantly, note that this would be the first occasion for a court to address a question that has loomed for several years now: Does the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) extend to the Islamic State? [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:43 am
Tennessee (2001) -- "judicial" ex post facto Brentwood Academy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 1:06 pm by Phil Dixon
Court of Appeals correctly determined that felony obstruction of justice conviction was supported by sufficient evidence of deceit and intent to defraud State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:23 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: This Article sheds light on the most important constitutional question opened up by the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decisions in District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:36 am by John Jascob
Furthermore, while the trial court clearly erred in instructing the jury on state of mind, the error did not “seriously impair” the integrity of the proceedings (U.S. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:02 pm
The Supreme Court's ruling issued a stern warning to Congress not to leave judicial duties to anyone other than the judicial branch. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:02 pm
The Supreme Court's ruling issued a stern warning to Congress not to leave judicial duties to anyone other than the judicial branch. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 8:57 am
" The city noted that the panel had acknowledged that its ruling conflicts with decisions "of most other federal courts of appeals, many State courts, and the highest local court in this jurisdiction, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. [read post]