Search for: "State v. Powers" Results 4361 - 4380 of 36,685
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:57 pm by Native American Rights Fund
City of El Paso (Tribal Real Property) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlMitchell v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 1:57 pm by Unknown
City of El Paso (Tribal Real Property) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlMitchell v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 1:55 pm by Amy Howe
When Prelogar responded that they would not, Roberts reminded her of the court’s recent decision in Biden v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:16 pm
Marty asks whether this provision violates the principles of United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Planned Parenthood, and Justice Thomas opinion focusing on abortion as eugenics; Supreme Court's granting of certiorari on Louisiana's abortion law; increasingly restrictive enactments by various states; and challenges to new HHS health care conscience rules.Supreme Court's decision in American Legion v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
Notes that the Public Law Project will not be making oral submissions, but says these are important submissions. 1200: Michael Fordham QC says the closest case we have is Bobb & Anor v Manning (Trinidad & Tobago) [2006] UKPC 22 (25 April 2006). 11:55:  Michael Fordham QC submits it is accepted prerogative power has to be exercised in the public interest. 11:48: Michael Fordham QC queries whether there is some magic for prerogative powers. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 10:52 am by Matt Cooper
Supreme Court, each with no chance of affecting the transition of power. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:09 pm by Andrew Pinson
Georgia joined nine other states in filing an amicus brief in support of the appellants in Rucho v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 6:19 am
Thornton (93-1456), 514 U.S. 779 (1995)(citations omitted), the case that rejected a state's power to impose term limits on its members of Congress. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 2:32 pm
L&Q -v- Ansell appears to state that, once the arrears and costs set out in the Possession Order have been paid, the occupier ceases to be a ‘tolerated trespasser’ in the sense of Burrows because their occupation is no longer subject to s.85 Housing Act 1985 - either in terms of execution of the order or possible application for variation of the order. [read post]