Search for: "State v. Save"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 11,753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2009, 10:15 pm
"* Sections 17 and 18 of the Public Officers Law, respectively, requires that the appropriate employer provide for the defense and indemnification of State and municipal officers and employees being sued for acts or omissions involving the performance of their official duties.The decision is posted on the Internet at:[www.courts.state.ny.us] [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:02 am
The holding in Allstate Insurance Company v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
I've benefited from much thoughtful commentary about last week's arguments in Trump v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 4:07 am
Here we had no warrant so the State needs a 4th Amendment exception to save this search, and the conviction. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 4:33 pm
(See Arguelles-Romero v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 10:41 am
Defense - Contributory Negligence; Failure to Examine Policy The Texas Supreme Court in Colonial Savings Association v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:58 am
The legality of the instruments usage has already been approved in a recent case, State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:52 am
Judge Shira Scheindlin's decisions in Zubulake v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:56 am
FTC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
MAGARINO, Petitioner, v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:11 am
= = = = = THOMPSON v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 2:23 pm
’McKenna v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
The Petitioner in the case had claimed that a saving clause in the amendment that stated prior regulations of the Town survived the amendment meant that the ZBA condition on height also survived, In rejecting that argument the Court noted that a condition fixed by a zoning board is not a Town regulation. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 8:21 am
The classic example was Naim v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 11:30 am
In Palermo v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 11:07 am
United States v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:48 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Oklahoma v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 10:13 am
General Assembly passed the “Uniting for peace” Resolution 377 (V)A. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:01 am
By Daniel RichardsonState v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 11:47 am
However, for the reasons articulated in my concurring opinion in Hutchinson v. [read post]
