Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 15,008
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
In fact, the largest ever study of running showed that running during pregnancy is generally safe.)After that incident, Thomas was placed on light duty at work for two weeks, and her doctor submitted a note stating that she was limited to “light activity” due to pregnancy complications. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 11:59 am
Industry Assn. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:20 am
Johnson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Jonassen, The "Ave Maria" Effect, 54 Idaho Law Review 729-811 (2018).Islamic Law, Society, and the State. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Michael Geist Doorey’s Workplace Law BlogHeller v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 3:39 pm
United States (1994); D.C. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:49 am
District of Colorado Judge William Martinez in Doe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:40 pm
The full text of the decision in Frank v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 7:49 am
Facts: This case (Michel v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
Study. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 7:00 am
Another interesting recent example is the decision of the California Court of Appeal in McCleery v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 5:20 pm
Citing the principles set out in Alexander v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 2:38 pm
In any case, efforts like this ought to be encouraged, and studied. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 6:32 am
The Supreme Court opened its January session Monday morning with argument in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 5:42 am
Relatively few women support the Islamic State; for example, according to the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation, about 13 percent of travelers from Western Europe to join the Islamic State were women, and in the U.S., there were only around 25 cases between 2011 and 2016. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:00 am
In the case of Kafaoglu v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:30 pm
Cabranes of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 2017-2018. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
Witness Hamdan v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:21 am
‘Should proceedings before the future UPC not comply with the standards of treatment under an IIA, which was signed by a Contracting Member State to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court (UPCA), the investor whose rights under the IIA would be infringed by acts of the UPC could initiate arbitral proceedings on the basis of the IIA against the Contracting Member State. [read post]
