Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 4,766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2009, 8:25 am
See, e.g., Gavaldon v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 10:41 pm
Hasbro, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 9:01 pm
” The case cite is Custom Auto Interiors, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
A blog post on Tex Parte - the Texas Lawyer Blog - summed it up succinctly: We don't need no stinkin' recusal. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:47 pm
Indeed, sellers will in fact hold up the buyers ex post and extract those rents. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:19 am
Back to Jones v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 7:39 am
English case law could do with some tidying up with regard to the extent to which original products are protected against lookalikes. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:14 am
Fourth, the role of intermediaries has come up frequently. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 8:15 am
Richardson and Califano v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 2:51 am
Thus if a consumer under the vertical agreement wanted to complain that the price charged by the price-fixer was excessive, that consumer had a claim for damages for breach of Article 81. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 9:37 am
This hasn't been a problem for most of us! [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 12:31 pm
Medicaid has become an inheritance protection plan. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Cir. 1992): 10NES program for protecting unauthorized cartridges; Atari developed "Rabbit" Program that overrode this protection. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
It's a journey that takes us back to a time before most of us were born, long before the Voting Rights Act, and the Civil Rights Act, Brown v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
As ever, don't forget to check out the IPKat's side bar for Forthcoming Events. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 3:58 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 5:31 pm
So consumers may need some protection. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:27 am
The Founding Fathers set up the American judiciary as a check on the excesses of the elected branches, and as a refuge when those branches are corrupted, or consumed by passing passions. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
NO CTM application: Danjaq v OHIM (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) ‘Customs: Commission publishes 2008 statistics of Customs actions to enforce intellectual property rights at the EU’s external border’ - EU IPR border detentions up (IPKat) Draft Rules of Procedure for a Unified Patent Litigation (BLOG@IP::JUR) Fröhlinger review: MARQUES and other organisations send joint letter (Class 46) Disputed balsamic vinegar among latest GI names to secure… [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:28 am
This at least is the conclusion one can draw from Case T-28/08, Mars v OHIM, in which the Court of First Instance of the European Communities confirmed that its Community trade mark for the three-dimensional shape of its Bounty bar was invalidly registered (see commentary on this decision here). [read post]
