Search for: "UNITED STATES MARSHALS" Results 4361 - 4380 of 5,388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2007, 12:14 am
Visit Legal Technology Law.com ® 10 United Nations Plaza, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102 (800) 903-9872. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Part I of this paper analyzes the ways that researchers, particularly in the United States, have attempted to define and identify cases of wrongful conviction. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 10:20 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Milena Sterio, professor of law at Cleveland State University’s Cleveland-Marshall College of law, will moderate the event featuring Peter Salisbury, senior analyst for Yemen at the International Crisis Group; A. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 8:04 am by Jim Sedor
” DOJ: Barrack, Wynn losses won’t derail foreign influence crackdown MSN – Caitlin Oprysko (Politico) | Published: 12/8/2022 The head of the Justice Department’s counterintelligence division vowed the department would not be deterred by a string of recent legal setbacks in its attempts to crackdown on foreign influence efforts in the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 6:37 pm by centerforartlaw
”[7] To strip a foreign sovereign of immunity, such suit must involve (1) property taken in violation of international law, and (2)(a) such property must be present in the United States in connection with a commercial activity carried on by the foreign state, or (2)(b) must be possessed by an “agency or instrumentality” of the foreign state that also carries on commercial activity in the United States.[8] When claimants file… [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 12:33 pm by Josh Blackman
Justices Marshall and Thomas had mustaches. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 5:05 am by Gritsforbreakfast
An examination of arson cases by my employers at the Innocence Project of Texas and the state fire marshal, initiated at the recommendation of the Forensic Science Commission, could discover false convictions based on flawed forensics testimony. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:56 am by Ann Althouse
Meanwhile, over at the White House, the President of the United States had a statement, released immediately upon the issuance of a new Supreme Court opinion strengthening free speech rights: With its ruling today, the Supreme Court has given a green light to a new stampede of special interest money in our politics. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 7:20 am by David Post
Certainly under that plan no state law could control the elector in performance of his federal duty, any more than it could a United States Senator who also is chosen by, and represents, the State. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 5:38 am by Gerard Magliocca
Roosevelt’s first “Hundred Days”–the Joint Resolution that took the United States off the gold standard and was upheld in a series of decisions,[15] and the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA), which was struck down in A.L.A. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 9:00 am by Keel Dietz
The United States has sanctioned the state-owned enterprises that oversee the timber, pearl, and gemstone industries. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
That three-Justice opinion (written by Justice Brennan and joined by Justices Marshall and Stevens) stressed that the tax exemption was not a permissible accommodation of religion, because it "burdens nonbeneficiaries markedly"[14] "by increasing their tax bills by whatever amount is needed to offset the benefit bestowed on subscribers to religious publications. [read post]
3 May 2024, 2:18 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
As of right now, he faces four counts of impersonating an officer of the United States. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am by Eric Muller
Julius graduated from high school in May 1954, the very month the United States Supreme Court announced its landmark ruling in Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm
Chief Justice John Marshall wrote almost two hundred years ago in Gibbons v. [read post]