Search for: "United States v. Alter" Results 4361 - 4380 of 4,640
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2008, 10:01 am
The Baze DecisionOn April 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued its plurality opinion inBaze v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 6:17 pm
I guess my first thought was whether it has any impact on State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
” There’s the first rub: The United States Congress felt that Daubert and its progeny, particularly Kumho Tire, somehow strayed from the plain language of Rule 702, so much so that Congress felt the need to amend the Rule “to reflect the changes” in the Rule brought about by the United States Supreme Court in interpreting Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 6:24 am
  When the United States Supreme Court addressed this problem with regard to claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 9:06 pm
CAAF's unanimous opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:58 pm
The decision is an exception to recent judicial trends in the wake of the United States Supreme Court's decision in April in Baze v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
  The response explained the late filing of the answer by stating that, on the day the answer was due, Respondents' counsel was delayed in returning to his office from a hearing. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:02 pm
Mukasey, No. 06-2477 "In order to establish eligibility for relief based exclusively on activities undertaken after his arrival in the United States, an alien must make some showing that authorities in his country of nationality are: 1) aware of his activities; or 2) likely to become aware of his activities. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 5:53 pm
Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39 (1950)) (alterations in Arizonans); see also United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 6:56 am
A case yesterday decided by the United States District Court of Connecticut highlights that distinction.In Charles v. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 6:12 am
CAAF's decision in United States v. [read post]