Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 9,859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
§337(a), which states:“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter [the entire FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
Most judges understand this distinction intuitively because they learned as 1Ls that the Constitution only restricts state action, not private action. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm
State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 9:24 am
All of this is filtered through a natural bias toward upholding convictions, resulting in a legal objection that is difficult to apply and a claim on appeal that seems unlikely to prevail.Yesterday's unpublished opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 6:47 am
It also modifies the injunction that entered after the district court found that the hiring tests have had a disparate impact on black applicants.The case is United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 8:23 am
Rascal House, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 8:27 am
The treatise is the standard reference in antitrust and the common-law nature of antitrust in the United States makes the treatise particularly influential. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 12:47 pm
Shares of the resources described in paragraphs A and B, shall increase on an annual basis by three unit percent d. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 2:11 pm
(Briseno v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:38 am
What needs to happen domestically for an active ingredient to be “produced in the United States”? [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Sibelius v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 3:01 pm
” To establish priority of use, a party must show that its owns a mark or trade name previously used in the United States and not abandoned. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 9:12 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 12:32 pm
’s ban on handguns (Heller v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 9:45 pm
United Kingdom, cited above, § 116, and Kontrová v. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 9:08 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
The traditional understanding is that the core of the Solicitor General’s responsibility is, in the words of former SG Seth Waxman, “to ascertain and represent the interests of the United States in litigation. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
The traditional understanding is that the core of the Solicitor General’s responsibility is, in the words of former SG Seth Waxman, “to ascertain and represent the interests of the United States in litigation. [read post]
