Search for: "United States v. Robert" Results 4361 - 4380 of 9,865
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2007, 1:27 am
DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Criminal Practice 13 KPMG Defendants Dismissed; 'Thompson' Memo Prevented Defense, Use of Attorneys of Choice United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 7:01 am by Mark M. Campanella, Esq.
The petitioner has nonetheless stated that it is considering its other options going forward, including a possible appeal to the United States Supreme Court and the possibility of its presenting better proof of its qualifying tax exempt status to the tax tribunal for consideration. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:58 pm by Amy Howe
And that’s not an embarrassment to the United States or the executive branch. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Public utility regulation as a distinct field of law arose at the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth centuries in the United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a unanimous court held that a trial court can consider mandatory minimums for possessing firearms when sentencing a defendant for an underlying drug offense. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:15 am by tjsllibrary
Scharf KMJ41.H87 N49 2008 (Lobby Display) Find this book in ThomCat More about this title from Amazon.com Environmental Regulation: Law, Science, and Policy Robert V. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 10:38 am by Peter Margulies
  As a quick review, it's important to note that DACA has two elements, as Chief Justice John Roberts explained in his opinion for the Supreme Court in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and others highlight the amicus brief the Institute has filed in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:53 am by Adam Feldman
United States, Merit Management Group v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:17 am by Miriam Seifter
  (Arlington says this is the same question the Court always asks at “Step Zero” of its Chevron inquiry, pursuant to the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]