Search for: "York v York"
Results 4361 - 4380
of 52,900
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2022, 4:29 pm
Meinhard v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 7:17 am
Public policy voids arbitrator’s awardCity of New York v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 6:22 pm
Matter of Joseph Confreda v New York State Comptroller This Article 78 proceeding was brought about by petitioner, Joseph Confreda, to review a determination of respondent Comptroller denying petitioner accidental disability retirement benefits. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 5:41 pm
Matter of Gerard O’Brien v New York State Comptroller This Article 78 proceeding was brought about by petitioner, Gerard O’Brien, to review a determination of respondent Comptroller denying petitioner accidental disability retirement benefits. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 12:17 pm
Matter of Bruce Harris v Department of Education of the City of New York In this Article 78 appeal case, petitioner sought to challenge respondents’ determination terminating petitioner’s employment as a New York City school teacher and to gain reinstatement of his employment with back pay and benefits. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:45 pm
Photo credit: Viorel Florescu/NY Daily News A New York trial court in Pujols v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
Supreme Court reversed the precedent-setting decision in Connecticut v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 7:12 am
Here is the opinion in Cayuga Nation v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:54 am
First, U.S. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:29 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 2:29 pm
However, in People v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 12:41 pm
As discussed in greater detail below, the ESSTA Amendments: (i) revise the amount of leave that New York City employers are required to provide; (ii) impose new employer reporting requirements; (iii) create new employer reimbursement obligations in connection with requested medical documentation and/or documentation regarding domestic violence; (iv) expand the scope of prohibited retaliation under the law; (v) impose new notice requirements; and (vi) expand enforcement… [read post]
25 May 2018, 10:26 am
The ruling is reproduced below: Boliak v ReillySupreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First DepartmentMay 24, 2018, Decided; May 24, 2018, Entered6654, 153941/16 Reporter2018 N.Y. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:49 am
McIntosh v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Only service of the petition and related papers an individual authorized by the agency head to accept service constitutes proper serviceMatter of Lowney v New York State Division of Human Rights, 2009 NY Slip Op 30270(U), February 4, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 108754/07, Judge: Walter B. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:02 am
Only service of the petition and related papers an individual authorized by the agency head to accept service constitutes proper serviceMatter of Lowney v New York State Division of Human Rights, 2009 NY Slip Op 30270(U), February 4, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 108754/07, Judge: Walter B. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 1:56 pm
The current elevated risk draws into focus the recent decision in Merck and International Indemnity v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 9:17 pm
725 Eatery Corp. d/b/a “Lace”, et. al., v City of New York, 2019 WL 4744218 (SDNY 9/30/2019) [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 1:12 pm
U S v Akayed Ullah Complaint (PDF) U S v Akayed Ullah Complaint (Text) [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 9:32 am
In essence, New York Times v. [read post]
