Search for: ""citizen's united"" Results 421 - 440 of 3,970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2012, 3:23 pm by Gerard Magliocca
I want to add my bucket of cold water to the views expressed by Tom Goldstein, Ed Whelan, and others about Jeffrey Toobin’s analysis of Citizens United appearing in this week’s New Yorker. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 10:09 am by Rick Hasen
The following is a guest post from Andrew Albright: In Citizens United, as we all know, the Supreme Court held that independent expenditures (IEs) cannot be a source of quid pro quo corruption so long as the persons or entities publishing the IEs… Continue reading The post Andrew Albright: “Opportunities for IE Reform in California Law in a Post-Citizens United World” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 5:20 pm by Howard Bashman
“Hawley Aims at Wokeness and Misses; The corporate speech to which he objects has nothing to do with Citizens United”: Bradley A. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 7:04 am by Rick Hasen
Now, they are making a play that could end in their biggest victory since the Citizens United ruling in 2010. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:33 pm by Rick Hasen
Lyle Denniston has an extensive analytical post on the Citizens United case. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:49 am by Glenn Reynolds
VIDEO: Nick Gillespie Debates Citizens United & Campaign Finance with Larry Lessig on Bill Moyers Journal. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:53 pm
The ABA Preview of Supreme Court Cases has posted this Q & A on Citizens United.... [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:04 am
"New charges for group that disrupted Supreme Court with Citizens United protest": The Associated Press has this report. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:00 am by Glenn Reynolds
A GOOD QUESTION: “Why Do Newspapers Support Westboro Baptist, but Not Citizens United? [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 9:08 am by Glenn Reynolds
SETH BARRETT TILLMAN: Citizens United and the Scope of Professor Teachout’s Anti-Corruption Principle. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 5:05 pm by rtruman
Supreme Court Grants Stay in Citizens United Montana Sequel, With Special Statement of J. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:25 am by rtruman
Colbert v. the Court: Why, in the Battle Over Citizens United, the Supreme Court Never Had a Chance [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:10 am by Unknown
The bill, Ending Corporate Influence on Elections Act of 2023, would “begin to undo” the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:38 am by Renae Bomba, Esq.
The measure will place a ballot question on the November 8, 2016 ballot asking voters whether California’s elected officials should use all of their constitutional authority, including proposing and ratifying one or more amendments to the United States Constitution, to overturn the Citizens United decision of the U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:33 am by Steve Shiffrin
Citizens United is the culmination of decades of decisions first creating rights of “commercial speech” culminating with Citizen United’s ringing approval of an anti-democratic corpocracy. [read post]