Search for: ""duty to warn""
Results 421 - 440
of 1,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2016, 7:45 am
However, a landowner has no duty to warn or to protect invitees from dangers that are open and obvious. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 1:17 pm
By law, a manufacturer of a product with known dangers has a duty to warn consumers who will foreseeably come in contact with the product and be subjected to those dangers. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 10:52 am
By contrast, property owners have no duty to warn guests of dangers that are unknown to them, or of things they do not realize are dangerous. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:35 pm
The court first acknowledged that the manufacturer of a product with known dangers has a duty to warn consumers of these dangers. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 12:16 pm
Jennifer Beck’s legislation would expand the state’s “duty to warn” law to help prevent more types of violent acts. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:35 am
Thus, Johnson & Johnson had a duty to warn Duffy of the risks associated with the use of the patch. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 3:12 pm
“Generally, a property owner owes two duties to an invitee: (1) the duty to use reasonable care in maintaining the property in a reasonably safe condition; and (2) the duty to warn of latent or concealed dangers which are or should be known to the owner and which are unknown to the invitee and cannot be discovered through the exercise of due care. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 2:33 pm
[The Atlantic] * Forget about the Prime Directive, why doesn't Star Fleet have a duty to warn about some of the crazy stuff they run across? [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 11:07 am
Basically, when a patient makes a credible threat, a mental health professional has a duty to warn. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 10:01 am
Many experts still think that it’s almost impossible for plaintiffs to prove that websites owe a special duty to their users, in which case failure-to-warn claims will fail on prima facie elements. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 1:31 pm
However, the panel, which consisted of three judges, declined to accept that argument, and claimed that because Janssen is a well-known drug manufacturer, it had a duty to warn physicians, and the labelling was a different matter. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 1:31 pm
However, the panel, which consisted of three judges, declined to accept that argument, and claimed that because Janssen is a well-known drug manufacturer, it had a duty to warn physicians, and the labelling was a different matter. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 1:07 pm
According to the court, the embankment complained of by the plaintiff was an open and obvious condition of which the restaurant owner owed no duty to warn the plaintiff, even though this allegedly resulted in the plaintiff being unable to exit the drive-through lane to get to safety during the attack. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 1:07 pm
According to the court, the embankment complained of by the plaintiff was an open and obvious condition of which the restaurant owner owed no duty to warn the plaintiff, even though this allegedly resulted in the plaintiff being unable to exit the drive-through lane to get to safety during the attack. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 9:02 am
Additional Resources: New York Court of Appeals Addresses the Duty to Warn of Asbestos Exposure, July 27, 2016, The National Law Review, By Amy M. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 11:48 am
The California Supreme Court adopted the “sophisticated intermediary doctrine” in regard to product liability claims, holding that a supplier can discharge its duty to warn only if it (1) provides adequate warnings or sells to a sophisticated buyer; and (2) reasonably relies on the buyer to warn end users of the harm. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 11:48 am
The California Supreme Court adopted the “sophisticated intermediary doctrine” in regard to product liability claims, holding that a supplier can discharge its duty to warn only if it (1) provides adequate warnings or sells to a sophisticated buyer; and (2) reasonably relies on the buyer to warn end users of the harm. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 5:45 am
The court’s holding that plaintiffs had failed to allege a sufficient “economic relationship” or any other assumption of a duty to warn by the successor. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 1:08 pm
Accordingly, a business owner ordinarily has no duty to warn a customer of an open, obvious, and present danger. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 1:08 pm
Accordingly, a business owner ordinarily has no duty to warn a customer of an open, obvious, and present danger. [read post]
