Search for: "*u.s. v. Hernandez" Results 421 - 440 of 759
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2011, 4:47 am
” There was no deadline in the warrant for completion of the forensic examination and analysis, “nor [does] the Fourth Amendment provide[] for a specific time limit in which a computer may undergo a government forensic examination after it has been seized pursuant to a search warrant” (United States v Hernandez, 183 F Supp 2d 468, 480; see United States v Syphers, 426 F3d 461, 469, cert denied 547 U.S. 1158, 126 S. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:58 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: In The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports on Hernandez v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Mesa, a case that stems from the fatal cross-border shooting of a Mexican teenager by a U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:12 pm
Category: Post-Grant Proceedings      By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor TitleBenefit Funding Sys., LLC v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 5:07 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
  Supreme Court of Georgia Rules on Juror Questions Issue The Supreme Court of Georgia issued an opinion in Hernandez v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
In the latest episode of Strict Scrutiny (podcast), Kate Shaw and Melissa Murray “talk breaking SCOTUS news; preview three cases from the upcoming November sitting — DACA, Hernandez v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:42 am by admin
 Judge Lauber further opined that even if the court assumed substantial compliance, the contribution was part of a quid pro quo exchange as defined in Hernandez v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:42 am by admin
 Judge Lauber further opined that even if the court assumed substantial compliance, the contribution was part of a quid pro quo exchange as defined in Hernandez v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 9:17 pm
Category: Claim Construction     By: Jesus Hernandez, Blog Editor/Contributor   Title Amdocs, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 7:15 am by Andrew Hamm
Lawrence Hurley of Reuters and Suzanne Monyak of Law360 cover the Supreme Court’s decision Tuesday to hear oral argument in Hernandez v. [read post]