Search for: "A B C Insurance" Results 421 - 440 of 5,801
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2005, 7:53 am
Assume also that Employee C is hired by Contractor A and performs some work for Principal B, and is hurt on Principal B's job-site. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:50 pm by Samuel Sorich
 The amended version of subsection (c) of section 2632.13 changes the presumptions that an insurer must follow when the insurer makes a principally at-fault determination. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 12:53 pm by Gary Becker
I would give it a grade of C+ as a short-term stimulus to the economy, and a grade of B+ for its effects on longer-term growth. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Alexander J. Davie
In order to be exempt from registering as an investment company under the two most frequently used exemptions under the Act, the fund must (1) not make, or propose to make, a public offering of its securities and (2) either (a) limit the fund to no more than 100 investors (the 3(c)(1) exemption) or (b) limit the fund to “qualified purchasers” (the 3(c)(7) exemption). [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 2:14 pm by Kevin LaCroix
For example, VEREIT had tried to argue that the endorsement adding AR Capital as an additional named insured to the program was intended only to protect AR Capital’s individual directors and officers under Coverage Part B (the reimbursement coverage) but not for the company itself under Coverage Part C (providing entity coverage for securities claims). [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 6:37 am by MBettman
Such an unfair or deceptive act or practice by a supplier violates this section…) R.C. 1345.81 (B) (Requires insurers to disclose the use of non-OEM parts used to repair a motor vehicle. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 5:42 am by Mark S. Humphreys
(c) This section does not: (1) make available as a defense an immaterial misrepresentation; or (2) affect the provisions of Section 705.004. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:24 pm by Philip J. Berenz
My clients are shocked to learn that (a) people actually drive cars with no insurance - as in 0 insurance; (b) they were hit and injured by someone with a basic policy of only $25,000.00 of coverage (the minimum in Illinois at this time); and/or (c) the other person's insurance was just "rescinded" for fraud or misrepresentation in taking out the policy (aka - again - no insurance!). [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 12:16 am
  An unauthorized insurer with the highest ratings would be granted 100% credit (while one with lower ratings would be eligible for 90%, 80%, 25% or 0% credit and be required to post the difference) provided that the unauthorized insurer:          (a) meets the standards of solvency, including standards for capital adequacy, established by its domiciliary… [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 7:17 am
Law § 3425(c)(2).Insurance Law § 3425(c) prevents an insurer from cancelling a personal lines insurance policy that has been in effect for more than 60 days, unless the cancellation is based on one of the permissible grounds set forth in the statute itself:(c) After a covered policy has been in effect for sixty days, or upon the effective date if the policy is a renewal, no notice of cancellation shall be issued to… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:24 pm
For more than twenty years, the inclination of the Florida Legislature has been to create laws that tilt the playing field in favor of employers and their insurance carriers (E/C) in disputes involving injured workers. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 6:08 pm by Goldfinger Injury Lawyers
” In my view, the trial judge’s decision not to put the question of punitive damages to the jury was reasonable in the circumstances, and his decision is entitled to deference in this court: B. [read post]